Mecanismos de defensa y respuestas de las plantas en la interacción micorrícica: una revisión

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.audienceInvestigadorspa
dc.audience.contentCientíficospa
dc.contributor.authorRamírez Gómez, Margarita
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez, Alia
dc.coverage.researchcenterC.I Tibaitatáspa
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-29T19:45:47Z
dc.date.available2025-05-29T19:45:47Z
dc.date.created2012-07
dc.date.issued2012
dc.description.abstractEl establecimiento de la simbiosis planta-hongos formadores de micorrizas Arbusculares (HFMA) requiere procesos armónicos a nivel espacio-temporal, que dependen de señales para el reconocimiento, colonización e intercambio bidireccional de nutrientes. Las plantas presentan respuestas de defensa frente a posibles organismos invasores; sin embargo, frente a HFMA estas son débiles, localizadas y no impiden la colonización del hongo. Los beneficios de la simbiosis generalmente se asocian a nutrición vegetal, aunque, también está relacionada con el incremento de la tolerancia-resistencia de plantas a los estreses bióticos. La resistencia inducida HFMA (MIR) es importante en el control de patógenos foliares, comedores de hojas y necrótrofos, encontrándose protección de plantas micorrizadas tanto a nivel local como sistémico, relacionada con los niveles de ácido jasmónico en tejidos. Un mecanismo en la MIR está asociado con el “priming”, que permite una rápida y eficiente respuesta de defensa de plantas micorrizadas. Se han planteado posibles mecanismos de atenuación de las respuestas de defensa, considerando: activación de supresores de defensa; plantas que producen respuestas de defensa frente a HFMA y otras que no las producen, y plantas que suprimen las respuestas de defensa en la simbiosis. Aunque el control de la simbiosisestá regulado básicamente por la planta, aún se desconoce el papel de los HFMA en el debilitamiento de las respuestas de defensa. Recientemente, se ha dado un avance importante en entender los mecanismos mediante los cuales se establece y mantiene la biotrofía del hongo, al describirse la proteína SP7 que interactúa con el factor de transcripción PR, ERF19 en el núcleo de la célula vegetal. Se ha sugerido que SP7 es un efector que actúa oponiéndose al programa de inmunidad de la planta. Este documento está orientado a hacer una revisión de las respuestas de defensa que presentan las plantas bajo condiciones de simbiosis con HFMA, con el fin tener un acercamiento sobre los posibles mecanismos de atenuación de las mismas, de forma tal que permite el establecimiento de la simbiosis. Además, se desea tener una aproximación al tema de la capacidad de defensa que presenta la planta micorrizada frente a un amplio grupo de organismos patógenos.spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifierhttp://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0123-34752012000100025&lng=en&nrm=iso
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Corporación colombiana de investigación agropecuaria AGROSAVIAspa
dc.identifier.issn0123-3475
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Biblioteca Digital Agropecuaria de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12324/40960
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherSciELOspa
dc.publisher.placeBogotá (Colombia)spa
dc.relation.citationendpage284
dc.relation.citationissue1
dc.relation.citationstartpage271
dc.relation.citationvolume14
dc.relation.ispartofjournalColombiana de Biotecnologíaspa
dc.relation.referencesAbdel-Fattah G.M. y Shabana Y.M. 2002. Efficacy of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (Glomus clarum) in protection of cowpea plants from root rot pathogen Rhizoctonia solani. J Plant Dis Protect. 109(2):207-215.spa
dc.relation.referencesAbdel-Fattah G.M., El-Haddadb S.A., Hafezc E.E., Rashadd Y.M. 2011. Induction of defense responses in common bean plants by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Microbiological Research. 166: 268-281.spa
dc.relation.referencesAkiyama K., Matsuzaki K., Hayashi H. 2005. Plant sesquiterpenes induce hyphal branching in arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Nature. 435: 824-827.spa
dc.relation.referencesBago B., Pfeffer E., Shachar Y. 2000. Carbon Metabolism and Transport in Arbuscular Mycorrhizal. Plant Physiol. 124: 949-958.spa
dc.relation.referencesBaldwin I.T., Halitschke R., Paschold A., von Dahl C., Preston C.A. 2006. Volatile signaling in plant-plant interactions: “Talking trees” in the genomic era. Science. 311: 812-815.spa
dc.relation.referencesBindschedler L.V., Dewdney J., Blee K.A., Stone J.M., Asai T., Plotnikov J., Denoux C., Hayes T., Gerrish C., Davies D.R., Ausubel F.M., Bolwell G.P. 2006. Peroxidase-dependent apoplastic oxidative burst in Arabidopsis required for pathogen resistance. Plant Journal. 47: 851–863.spa
dc.relation.referencesBlee K.A., Anderson A.J. 2000. Defence responses in plants to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. En: Podila G.K., Douds D., eds. Current advances in mycorrhizae research. Minnesota, USA: The Am. Phytopathol. Soc, 27–44.spa
dc.relation.referencesBlilou I., Ocampo J., García-Garrido J. 2000 (a). Induction of catalase and ascorbate peroxidase activities in tobacco roots inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal Glomus mosseae. Mycol. Res. 104: 722–725.spa
dc.relation.referencesBlilou I., Ocampo J., García-Garrido J. 2000 (b). Induction of Ltp (lipid transfer protein) and Pal (phenylalanine ammonialyase) gene expression in rice roots colonized by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae. J. Exp. Bot. 51: 1969–1977.spa
dc.relation.referencesBoller, T., Felix G. 2009. A renaissance of elicitors: perception of microbe-associated molecular patterns and danger signals by pattern-recognition receptors. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 60: 379–406.spa
dc.relation.referencesBonfante P., Genre A. 2008. Plants and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: an evolutionary-developmental perspective. Trends in Plant Science. 13(9): 492-498.spa
dc.relation.referencesBonfante P., Requena N. 2011. Dating in the dark: how roots respond to fungal signals to establish arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 14(4):451–457.spa
dc.relation.referencesBostock R. 2005. Signal crosstalk and induced resistance: straddling the line between cost and benefit. Annu. Rev. Phytophatol. 43: 545-580.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrooks D.M., Bender C.L., Kunkel B.N. 2005. The Pseudomona syringae prhytotoxin coronatine promotes virulence by overcoming salicylic acid-dependent defences in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant Pathol. 6: 629-639.spa
dc.relation.referencesCameron R.K., Paiva N.L., Lamb C.J., Dixon R.A. 1999. Accumulation of salicylic acid and PR gene transcripts in relation to the systemic acquired resistence (SAR) response by Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato in Arabidopsis. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 55: 121-130.spa
dc.relation.referencesCao H., Bowling S.A., Gordon A.S., Dong X. 1994. Characterization of an Arabidopsis mutant that is nonresponsive to inducers of systemic acquired resistance. Plant Cell. 8:1583-1592.spa
dc.relation.referencesChandanie W.A., Kubota I.T.O.M., Hyakumachi M.M. 2006. Interaction between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae and plant growth promoting fungus Phoma sp. on their root colonization and disease suppression of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Annu Rep Int Res Inst Environ Sci. 24: 91-102.spa
dc.relation.referencesChandanie W.A., Kubota I.T.O.M., Hyakumachi M.M. 2006. Interaction between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus mosseae and plant growth promoting fungus Phoma sp. on their root colonization and disease suppression of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Annu Rep Int Res Inst Environ Sci. 24: 91-102.spa
dc.relation.referencesChisholm S.T., Coaker G., Day B., Staskawicz B.J. 2006. Host microbe interactions: shaping the evolution of the plant immune response. Cell. 124: 803-814.spa
dc.relation.referencesClarke J.D.,Volko S.M., Ledford H., Ausubel FM., Dong X. 2000. Roles of salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, and ethylene in cpr induced resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 12:2175–90.spa
dc.relation.referencesConhard U., Pieterse C.M. and Mauch-Mani B. 2002. Priming in plant pathogen interactions. Trend Plant Sci, 7: 210-216.spa
dc.relation.referencesConhard U., Beckers G., Flors V., García-Agustín P., Jakab G., Mauch F., Newman M.A., Pieterse C., Poinssot B., Pozo M.J., Pugin A., Schaffrath U., Ton J., Wendehenne D., Zimmerli L., Mauch-Mani B. 2006. Priming: getting ready for battle. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 19, 1062-1071.spa
dc.relation.referencesCordier C., Pozo M.J., Barea J.M., Gianinazzi S., Gianinazzi- Pearson V. 1998. Cell defense responses associated with localized and systemic resistance to Phytophthora induced in tomato by an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 11:1017-1028.spa
dc.relation.referencesDangl J.L., Jones J.D. 2001. Plant pathogens and integrated defence responses to infection. Nature. 411: 826–833.spa
dc.relation.referencesDespres C., Chubak C., Rochon A., Clark R., Bethune T. 2003. The Arabidopsis NPR1 disease resistance protein is a novel cofactor that confers redox regulation of DNA binding activity to the basic domain/leucine zipper transcription factor TGA1. Plant Cell. 15:2181–2191.spa
dc.relation.referencesDespres C., DeLong C., Glaze S., Liu E., Fobert P.R. 2000. The Arabidopsis NPR1/NIM1 protein enhances the DNA binding activity of a subgroup of the TGA family of bZIP transcription factors. Plant Cell. 12:279–290.spa
dc.relation.referencesDesveaux D., Subramaniam R., Despres C., Mess J.N., Levesque C. 2004. A “Whirly” transcription factor is required for salicylic acid-dependent disease resistance in Arabidopsis. Dev. Cell. 6:229–240.spa
dc.relation.referencesDelaux, P., Nanda A.K., Mathé C., Sejalon-Delmas N. and Dunand C. 2012. Molecular and biochemical aspects of plant terrestrialization. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematic. 14(1): 49– 59.spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Vos M., Van Oosten V.R., Van Poecke R.M.P., Van Pelt J.A., Pozo M.J., Mueller M.J., Buchala A.J., Métraux J.P., Van Loon LC., Dicke M., Pieterse C.M.J. 2005. Signal signature and transcriptome changes of Arabidopsis during pathogen and insect attack. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 18: 923-937.spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Vos M., Van Zaanen W., Koornneef A., Korzelius J.P., Dicke M., Van Loon L.C., Pieterse C.M.J. 2006. Herbivore-induced resistance against microbial pathogens in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 142: 352-363.spa
dc.relation.referencesDicke M., Agrawal A.A., Bruin J. 2003. Plants talk, but are they deaf? Trend Plants Science. 8: 403-405.spa
dc.relation.referencesDicke M., Hilker M. 2003. Induced plant defenses: form molecular biology to evolutionary ecology. Basic Appl. Ecol. 4: 3-14.spa
dc.relation.referencesDumas-Gaudot E., Gollotte A., Cordier C., Gianinazzi S. and Gianinazzi- Pearson V. 2000. Modulation of host defence systems. En: Arbuscular Mycorrhizas: Physiology and Function. Academic Publishers. 173-200.spa
dc.relation.referencesDurrant W.E., Dong X. 2004. Systemic acquired resistance. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol 42:185-209.spa
dc.relation.referencesEl-Khallal SM. 2007. Induction and modulation of resistance in tomato plants against Fusarium wilt disease by bioagent fungi (arbuscular mycorrhiza) and/or hormonal elicitors (jasmonic acid and salicylic acid): 2-changes in the antioxidant enzymes, phenolic compounds and pathogen related-proteins. Aust J Basic Appl Sci. 1(4): 717-732.spa
dc.relation.referencesEmiliani, G., Fondi, M., Fani, R., Gribaldo, S., 2009. A horizontal gene transfer at the origin of phenylpropanoid metabolism: a key adaptation of plants to land. Biology Direct. 4:7.spa
dc.relation.referencesFalk A., Feys B.J., Frost L.N., Jones J.D., Daniels M.J., Parker J.E. 1999. EDS1, an essential component of R gene-mediated disease resistance in Arabidopsis has homology to eukaryotic lipases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 96 (6):3292–3297.spa
dc.relation.referencesFester T., Hause G. 2005. Accumulation of reactive oxygen species in arbuscular mycorrhizal roots. Mycorrhiza. 15:373–379.spa
dc.relation.referencesFisher R.F., Long S.R. 1992. Rhizobium – plant signal exchange. Nature. 357:655–660.spa
dc.relation.referencesForeman J., Demidchik V., Bothwell J.H.F., Mylona P., Miedema H., Torres M.A., Linstead P., Costa S., Brownlee C., Jones J.D.G., Davies J.M., Dolan L. 2003. Reactive oxygen species produced by NADPH oxidase regulate plant cell growth. Nature. 422: 442–446.spa
dc.relation.referencesFritz M., Jakobsen I., Lyngkjaer M.F., Thordal-Christensen H., Pons-Kuehnemann J. 2006. Arbuscular mycorrhiza reduces susceptibility of tomato to Alternaria solani. Mycorrhiza. 16:413-419.spa
dc.relation.referencesGadkar V., Schwartz R., Kunik T., Kapulnik Y. 2001. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Colonization. Factors Involved in Host Recognition. Plant Physiology. 127: 1493–1499.spa
dc.relation.referencesGange A. 2006. Insect–mycorrhizal interactions patterns processes, and consequences. En: Indirect Interaction Webs: Nontrophic Linkages Through Induced Plant Traits. Cambridge U. Press; 2006:124-144.spa
dc.relation.referencesGarcía-Garrido J.M., Ocampo J.A. 2002. Regulation of the plant defence response in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Journal of Experimental Botany. 53 (373): 1377-1386.spa
dc.relation.referencesGarcía-Garrido J.M., Tribak M., Rejón-Palomares A., Ocampo J.A., García-Romera I. 2000. Hydrolitic enzymes and ability of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to colonize roots. J. of Experimental Botany. 51: 1443–1448.spa
dc.relation.referencesGenre A., Chabaud M., Timmers T., Bonfante P., Barkerb D. 2005. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Elicit a Novel Intracellular Apparatus in M. truncatula Root Epidermal Cells before Infection. Plant Cell. 17:3489-3499.spa
dc.relation.referencesGenre A., Chabaud M., Faccio A., Barker D., Bonfante P. 2008. Prepenetration Apparatus Assembly Precedes and Predicts the Colonization Patterns of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi within the Root Cortex of Both Medicago truncatula and Daucus carota. The Plant Cell. 20:1407-1420.spa
dc.relation.referencesGinzberg I, David R, Shaul O, Elad Y, Wininger S, Ben-Dor B, Badani H, Fang Y, Van Rhijn P, Li Y, Hirsch A, Kapulnik Y. 1998. Glomus intraradices colonization regulates gene expression in tobacco roots. Symbiosis. 25: 145-147.spa
dc.relation.referencesGlazebrook J., Chen W., Estes B., Chang H.S., Nawrath C. 2003. Topology of the network integrating salicylate and jasmonate signal transduction derived from global expression phenotyping. Plant J. 34:217–228.spa
dc.relation.referencesGlazebrook J. 2005. Contrasting mechanisms of defense against biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens. Annu. Rev. Phytopat. 43: 205-227.spa
dc.relation.referencesGollotte A., Gianinazzi-Pearson V., Giovannetti M., Sbrana C., Avio L., Gianinazzi S. 1993. Cellular localization and cytochemical probing of resistance reactions to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a ‘‘locus a’’ mycS mutant of Pisum sativum L. Planta. 191: 112-122.spa
dc.relation.referencesGough, C., Cullimore, J. 2011. Lipo-chitooligosaccharide signaling in endosymbiotic plant–microbe interactions. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 24: 867-878.spa
dc.relation.referencesGuenoune D, Galili S, Phillips DA, Volpin H, Chet I, Okon Y, Kapulnik Y. 2001. The defense response elicited by the pathogen Rhizoctonia solani is suppressed by colonization of the AM-fungus Glomus intraradices. Plant Sci.160(5):925-932.spa
dc.relation.referencesGuerrieri E., Lingua G., Digilio M.C., Massa N., Berta G. 2004. Do interactions between plant roots and the rhizosphere affect parasitoid behaviour? Ecol. Entomol. 29:753-756.spa
dc.relation.referencesGuillon C., St-Arnaud M., Hamel C., Jabaji-Hare S. 2002. Differential and systemic alteration of defence-related gene transcript levels in mycorrhizal bean plants infected with Rhizoctonia solani. Canadian Journal of Botany. 80(3):305— 315.spa
dc.relation.referencesGust A., Willmann R., Desaki Y., Grabherr H.M., Nürnberger T. 2012. Plant LysM proteins: modules mediating symbiosis and immunity. Trends in Plant Science. (In press).spa
dc.relation.referencesHacisalihoglu G., Duke E., Longo L. 2005. Differential response of common bean genotypes to mycorrhizal colonization. Proc Fla State Hortic Soc.118:150—152.spa
dc.relation.referencesHarley J.L., Smith S.E. 1983. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Academic Press, London.spa
dc.relation.referencesHarrier L.A., Watson C.A. 2004. The potential role of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi in the bioprotection of plants against soil borne pathogens in organic and/or other sustainable farming systems. Pest Manag Sci. 60(2): 149—157.spa
dc.relation.referencesHarrison M.J. 2005. Signaling in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 59:19-42.spa
dc.relation.referencesHause B., Mrosk C., Isayenkov S., Dieter S. 2007. Jasmonates in arbuscular mycorrhizal interactions. Phytochem. 68(1): 101-110.spa
dc.relation.referencesHowe G.A. 2004. Jasmonates as signals in the wound response. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 23 (3): 223-237.spa
dc.relation.referencesHu J., Lin X., Wang J., Shen W., Wu S., Peng S., Mao T. 2010. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Inoculation Enhances Suppression of Cucumber Fusarium Wilt in Greenhouse Soils. Pedosphere. 20(5): 586–593.spa
dc.relation.referencesJasper D., Robson A., Abbott L. 1979. Phosphorus and the formation of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizas. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 11: 501–505.spa
dc.relation.referencesKaku H., Nishizawa Y., Ishii-Minami N., Akimoto-Tomiyama C., Dohmae N., Takio K., Minami E., Shibuya, N. 2006. Plant cells recognize chitin fragments for defense signaling through a plasma membrane receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 103 (29): 11086–11091.spa
dc.relation.referencesKauss H., Jeblick W., Ziegler J., Krabler W. 1994. Pretreatment of parsley (Petroselinum crispum L) suspension cultures with methyl jasmonate enhances elicitation of activated oxygen species. Plant Physiol. 105: 89-104.spa
dc.relation.referencesKessler A., Halitschke R., Diezel C., Baldwin I.T. 2006. Priming of plant defenses responses in nature by airborne signaling between Artemisa tridentate and Nicotiana attenuate. Oecologia 148 (2): 280-292.spa
dc.relation.referencesKishimoto K., Kouzai Y., Kaku H., Shibuya, N., Minami E., Nishizawa Y. 2010. Perception of the chitin oligosaccharides contributes to disease resistance to blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae in rice. The Plant Journal. 64 (2): 343–354.spa
dc.relation.referencesKloppholz S., Kuhn H., Requena N. 2011. A secreted fungal effector of Glomus intraradices promotes symbiotic biotrophy. Curr Biol. 21: 1204-1209.spa
dc.relation.referencesKosuta S., Chabaud M., Lougnon G., Gough C., Dénarié J., Barker D., Bécard G. 2003. A Diffusible Factor from Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Induces Symbiosis-Specific MtENOD11 Expression in Roots of M. truncatula. Plant Physiol. 131: 952-962.spa
dc.relation.referencesKump L.R., 2008. The rise of atmospheric oxygen. Nature. 451: 277–278.spa
dc.relation.referencesLamb C., Dixon R.A. 1997. The oxidative burst in plant disease resistance. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology. 48: 251–275.spa
dc.relation.referencesLambais M.R. 2000. Regulation of plant defence-related genes in arbuscular mycorrhizae. En: Current advances in mycorrhizae research. Minnesota, USA. The American Phytopathological Soc. 45–59.spa
dc.relation.referencesLi J., Brader G., Palva E.T. 2004. The WRKY70 transcription factor: a node of convergence for jasmonate –mediated and salicylate-medaiated signals in plant defense. Plant cell. 16: 319-331.spa
dc.relation.referencesLi H.Y., Yang G.D., Shu H.R., Yang Y.T., Ye B.X., Nishida I., Zheng C.C. 2006. Colonization by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus versiforme induces a defense response against the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita in the grapevine (Vitis amurensis Rupr.), which includes transcriptional activation of the class III chitinase gene VCH3. Plant Cell Physiol. 47:154-163.spa
dc.relation.referencesLimpens E., Franken C., Smit P., Willemse J., Bisseling T., Geurts R. 2003. LysM domain receptor kinases regulating rhizobial Nod factor-induced infection. Science. 302, 630–633.spa
dc.relation.referencesLiu J., Blaylock L., Endre G., Cho J., Town C., Harrison M. 2003. Transcript profiling coupled with spatial expression analyses reveals genes involved in distinct developmental stages of an arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Plant Cell. 15: 2106-2123.spa
dc.relation.referencesLiu J., Maldonado I., Lopez M., Cheung F., Town C., Harrison M. 2007. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis is accompanied by local and systemic alterations in gene expression and an increase in disease resistance in the shoots. Plant J. 50 (3):529-544.spa
dc.relation.referencesLorenzo O., Piqueras R., Sánchez-Serrano J.J., Solano R. 2003. ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR1 integrates signals from ethylene and jasmonate pathways in plant defense. Plant Cell. 15 (1): 165-178spa
dc.relation.referencesMadsen E.B., Madsen L.H., Radutoiu S., Olbryt M., Rakwalska M., Szczyglowski K., Sato S., Kaneko T., Tabata S., Sandal N., Stougaard J. 2003. A receptor kinase gene of the LysM type is involved in legume perception of rhizobial signals. Nature. 425: 637– 640.spa
dc.relation.referencesMiya A., Albert P., Shinya T., Desaki Y., Ichimura K., Shirasu K., Narusaka Y., Kawakami N., Kaku H., Shibuya N. 2007. CERK1, a LysM receptor kinase, is essential for chitin elicitor signaling in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104: 19613–19618.spa
dc.relation.referencesMur L., Kenton A., Atzorn R., Miersch O., Wasternack C. 2006. The outcomes of concentration-specific interaction between salicylate and jasmonate signal include synergy, antagonism and oxidative stress leading to cell death. Plant Physiol. 140: 249-262.spa
dc.relation.referencesMur L.A.J., Brown I.R., Darby R.M., Bestwick C.S., Bi Y.M., Mansfield J.W., Draper J. 1996. Salicylic acid potentiates defence gene expression in tissue exhibiting acquired resistance to pathogen attack. Plant J. 9: 559-571.spa
dc.relation.referencesNawrath C., Heck S., Parinthawong N., Metraux J.P. 2002. EDS5, an essential component of salicylic acid-dependent signaling for disease resistance in Arabidopsis, is a member of the MATE transporter family. Plant Cell. 14:275–286.spa
dc.relation.referencesNomura K., Melotto M., He S.Y. 2005. Supression of host defense in compatible plant- Pseudomonas syringae interactions. Curr Opinion Plant Biol. 8: 361-368.spa
dc.relation.referencesNorman-Setterblad C., Vidal S., Palva E.T. 2000. Interacting signal pathways control defense gene expression in Arabidopsis in response to cell wall-degrading enzymes from Erwinia carotovora. Mol. Plant Microbe. 13(4):430-438.spa
dc.relation.referencesOldroyd G., Downie J.A. 2006. Nuclear calcium changes at the core of symbiosis signaling. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 9:351–357.spa
dc.relation.referencesOldroyd G., Harrison M. and Paszkowski U. 2009. Reprogramming Plant Cells for endosymbiosis. Science. 324: 753-754.spa
dc.relation.referencesOp den Camp R., Streng A., De Mita S., Cao Q., Polone E., Liu W., Ammiraju J., Kudrna D., Wing R., Untergasser A., Bisseling T., Geurts R. 2011. LysM-type mycorrhizal receptor recruited for rhizobium symbiosis in nonlegume Parasponia. Science. 331(6019): 909-912.spa
dc.relation.referencesParniske M. 2000. Intracellular accommodation of microbes by plants: A common developmental program for symbiosis and disease? Curr Opin Plant Biol. 3:320–328.spa
dc.relation.referencesParniske M. 2004. Molecular genetics of the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Curr Opinion Plant Biol. 7:414- 421.spa
dc.relation.referencesParniske M. 2008. Arbuscular mycorrhiza: the mother of plant root endosymbioses. Nat Rev Microbiol. 6: 763-775.spa
dc.relation.referencesPei Z.M., Murata Y., Benning G., Thomine S., Klusener B., Allen G.J., Grill E., Schroeder J.I. 2000. Calcium channels activated by hydrogen peroxide mediate abscisic acid signalling in guard cells. Nature. 406: 731–734.spa
dc.relation.referencesPieterse C., Van Wees S., Hoffland E., Van Pel J., Van Loon L. 1996. Systemic resistance in Arabidopsis induced by biocontrol bacteria is independent of salicylic acid accumulation and pathogenesis-related gene expression. Plant Cell. 8:1225-1237.spa
dc.relation.referencesPieterse C., Van Pelt J., Ton J, Parchmann S., Mueller M., Buchala A., Métraux J., Van Loon L. 2000. Rhizobacteria- mediated induced systemic resistance (ISR) in Arabidopsis requires sensitivity to jasmonate and ethylene but is not accompanied by an increase in their production. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 57:123-134.spa
dc.relation.referencesPieterse C., Van Wees S., Ton J., Van Pelt J., Van Loon L. 2002. Signaling in rhizobacteria-induced systemic resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Biol. 4:535-544.spa
dc.relation.referencesPieterse C., Dicke M. 2007. Plant interactions with microbes and insects from molecular mechanisms to ecology. Trends in Plant Science. 12 (12): 564-569.spa
dc.relation.referencesPozo M., Azcón-Aguilar C., Dumas E. and Barea J. 1999. β1,3-Glucanase activities in tomato roots inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and/or Phytophthora parasitica and their possible involvement in bioprotection. Plant Sci. 141:149-157.spa
dc.relation.referencesPozo M., Cordier C., Dumas-Gaudot E., Gianinazzi S., Barea J. and Azcón-Aguilar C. 2002. Localized vs systemic effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on defence responses to Phytophthora infection in tomato plants. J Exp Bot. 53: 525-534.spa
dc.relation.referencesPozo M., Van Loon L., Pieterse C. 2004. Jasmonates Signals in plant-microbe interactions. J Plant Growth Regul. 23:211-222.spa
dc.relation.referencesPozo M., Azcón-Aguilar C. 2007. Unraveling mycorrhizal-induced resitance. Curr Opinion in Plant Biology. 10: 393-398.spa
dc.relation.referencesReinhardt D. 2007. Programming good relations-development of the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Curr Op Plant Biol. 10:98-105.spa
dc.relation.referencesRemy W., Taylor T.N., Hass H., Kerp H. 1994. Four hundred million year old vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 91: 11841-11843.spa
dc.relation.referencesRadutoiu S., Madsen L.H., Madsen E.B., Felle H.H., Umehara Y., Grønlund M., Sato S., Nakamura Y., Tabata S., Sandal N., Stougaard J. 2003. Plant recognition of symbiotic bacteria requires two LysM receptor-like kinases. Nature. 425: 585–592.spa
dc.relation.referencesRequena N., Serrano E., Ocon A., Breuninger M. 2007. Plant signals and fungal perception during arbuscular mycorrhizae establishment. Phytochemistry. 68: 33–40.spa
dc.relation.referencesSalzer P., Boller T. 2000. Elicitor induced reactions in mycorrhizae and their suppression. En: Current Advances in Mycorrhizae Research. APS Press. 1-10.spa
dc.relation.referencesShah J. 2009. Plants under attack: systemic signals in defence. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 12:459–464.spa
dc.relation.referencesSharma D., Kapoor R., Bhatnagar A. K. 2009. Differential growth response of Curculigo orchioides to native arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal (AMF) communities varying in number and fungal components. Europ J Soil Biol. 45(4): 328–333.spa
dc.relation.referencesShaul O., David R., Sinvani G., Ginzberg I., Ganon D., Wininger S., Ben-Dor B., Badani H., Ovdat N., Kapulnik Y. 2000. Plant defense responses during arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. En: Current Advances in Mycorrhizae Research. APS Pres. 61-68.spa
dc.relation.referencesShaul O., Galili S., Volpin H., Ginzberg I., Elad Y., Chet I., Kapulnik Y. 1999. Mycorrhiza-induced changes in disease severity and PR protein expression in tobacco leaves. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 12:1000-1007.spa
dc.relation.referencesShimizu T., Nakano T., Takamizawa D., Desaki Y., Ishii-Minami N., Nishizawa Y., Minami E., Okada K., Yamane H., Kaku H., Shibuya N. 2010. Two LysM receptor molecules, CEBiP and OsCERK1, cooperatively regulate chitin elicitor signaling in rice. Plant J. 64: 204–214.spa
dc.relation.referencesShinshi H., Mohnen D., Meins F. 1987. Regulation of a plant pathogenesis-related enzyme: inhibition of chitinase and chitinase mRNA accumulation in cultured tobacco tissues by auxin and cytokinin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 84: 89–93.spa
dc.relation.referencesSmith S., Read D. 2008. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. Academic Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesSpoel S., Koornneef A., Claessens S., Korzelius J., Van Pelt J., Mueller M., Buchala A., Métraux J., Brown R., Kazan K. 2003. NPR1 modulates cross-talk between salicylate- and jamonate- dependent defense pathways through a novel function in the cytosol. Plant Cell. 15: 760-770.spa
dc.relation.referencesSpoel, S.H., Dong, X. 2012. How do plants achieve immunity? Defence without specialized immune cells. Nat Rev Immunol. 12: 89– 100.spa
dc.relation.referencesSticher L., Mauch-Mani B., Métraux J.P. 1997. Systemic acquired resistance. Ann Rev Phytopat. 35: 235-270.spa
dc.relation.referencesTorres M.A., Dangl J.L. 2005. Functions of the respiratory burst oxidase in biotic interactions, abiotic stress and development. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 8: 397–403.spa
dc.relation.referencesTraw M.B., Kim J., Enright S., Cipollini D.F., Bergelson J. 2003. Negative cross – talk between salicylate- and jamonate- mediated pathways in the Wassilewskija ecotype of Arabidospsis thaliana. Mol. Ecol. 12: 1125-1135.spa
dc.relation.referencesTruman W., Bennett M.H., Kubigsteltig I., Turnbull C., Grant M. 2007. Arabidopsis systemic immunity uses conserved defense signaling pathways and is mediated by jasmonates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 104:1075-1080.spa
dc.relation.referencesVan Loon L.C. 2007. Plant responses to plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Eur J Plant Pathol. 119:243-354.spa
dc.relation.referencesVan Loon L., Bakker P., Pieterse C. 1998. Systemic resistance induced by rhizosphere bacteria. Ann Rev Phyt. 36:453-483.spa
dc.relation.referencesVan Poecke R.P.M., Dicke M. 2004. Indirect defense of plants against herbivores using Arabidopsis thaliana as a model plant. Plant Biol. 6: 387-401.spa
dc.relation.referencesVerhagen B., Glazebrook J., Zhu T., Chang H., Van Loon L., Pieterse C. 2004. The transcriptome of rhizobacteria induced systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 17: 895-908.spa
dc.relation.referencesVierheilig H., Alt M., Mohr U., Boller T., Wiemken A. 1994. Ethylene biosynthesis and activities of chitinase and ß-1,3-glucanase in the roots of host and non-host plants of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi after inoculation with Glomus mosseae. J of Plant Physiol. 143 (3): 337–343.spa
dc.relation.referencesVierheilig H., Piché Y. 2002. Signaling in arbuscular mycorrhiza: facts and hypotheses. En: Flavonoids in the living system. New York: Plenum Press.spa
dc.relation.referencesVlot A.C., Klessig D.F., Park S.W. 2008. Systemic acquired resistance: the elusive signal(s). Curr Opin Plant Biol. 11(4):436-442.spa
dc.relation.referencesWan J., Zhang X.C., Neece D., Ramonell K.M., Clough S., Kim S.Y., Stacey M.G., Stacey G. 2008. A LysM receptor-like kinase plays a critical role in chitin signaling and fungal resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 20: 471–481.spa
dc.relation.referencesWang, F., Lin, X., Yin, R. 2005. Heavy metal uptake by arbuscular mycorrhizas of Elsholtzia splendens and the potential for phytoremediation of contaminated soil. Plant Soil. 269: 225–232.spa
dc.relation.referencesWang F. Y., Lin X. G., Yin, R. 2007. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal inoculation on heavy metal accumulation of maize grown in a naturally contaminated soil. Int. J. Phytorem. 9: 345–353.spa
dc.relation.referencesWhipps J. 2004. Prospects and limitations for mycorrhizas in biocontrol of root pathogens. Can. J. Bot. 82:1198-1227.spa
dc.relation.referencesWildermuth M.C., Dewdney J., Wu G., Ausubel F. 2001 Isochorismate synthase is required to synthesize salicylic acid for plant defence. Nature. 414:562– 565.spa
dc.relation.referencesWillmann R., Lajunen H.M., Erbs G., Newman M.A., Kolb D., Tsuda K., Katagiri F., Fliegmann J., Bono J.J., Cullimore J.V., Jehle A.K., Götz F., Kulik A., Molinaro A., Lipka V., Gust A.A., Nürnberger T. 2011. Arabidopsis lysin-motif proteins LYM1 LYM3 CERK1 mediate bacterial peptidoglycan sensing and immunity to bacterial infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 108:19824–19829.spa
dc.relation.referencesYao M., Desilets H., Charles M., Boulanger R., Tweddell R. 2003. Effect of mycorrhization on the accumulation of rishitin and olavetivone in potato plantlets challenged with Rhizoctonia solani. Mycorrhiza. 13:333-336.spa
dc.relation.referencesZipfel, C. 2008. Pattern-recognition receptors in plant innate immunity. Curr Opin Immunol. 20 (1): 10–16.spa
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.sourceColombiana de Biotecnología; Vol. 14, Núm. 1 (2012):Colombiana de Biotecnología (Jul.);p. 271-284.spa
dc.subject.agrovocHongospa
dc.subject.agrovocMicorrizas arbuscularesspa
dc.subject.agrovocMecanismo de defensaspa
dc.subject.agrovocSimbiosisspa
dc.subject.agrovocurihttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3145
dc.subject.agrovocurihttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1415699873241
dc.subject.agrovocurihttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_35269
dc.subject.agrovocurihttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7563
dc.subject.faoInvestigación agropecuaria - A50spa
dc.subject.redTransversalspa
dc.titleMecanismos de defensa y respuestas de las plantas en la interacción micorrícica: una revisiónspa
dc.title.translatedPlant defense mechanisms and responses in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis: a review.spa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.localArtículo científicospa
dc.type.localengarticleeng
dc.type.redcolhttps://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
Ver_Documento_40960.pdf
Tamaño:
3.28 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Artículos científicos