Eficacia de antagonistas microbianos y quitina en el control de Colletotrichum gloeosporioides en poscosecha de mango cv. Azúcar

dc.audienceInvestigadorspa
dc.audience.contentCientíficospa
dc.contributor.authorZapata Narvaez, Yimmy Alexander
dc.contributor.authorIzquierdo Garcia, Luisa Fernanda
dc.contributor.authorBotina Azain, Blanca Lucia
dc.contributor.authorBeltran Acosta, Camilo Ruben
dc.coverage.countryColombiaspa
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-21T16:23:43Z
dc.date.available2024-02-21T16:23:43Z
dc.date.created2021-04-17
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractSe determinó la eficacia en el control de la antracnosis en la poscosecha de mango cv. Azúcar sometiendo la fruta a un tratamiento hidrotérmico a 53 °C, realizando posteriormente dos heridas de 2 mm de profundidad, luego se realizó la inmersión en suspensiones de los antagonistas o quitina en diferentes concentraciones, posteriormente en cada herida se inoculó una gota de 5 µL del patógeno, almacenando la fruta a 23 °C. De este ensayo se seleccionó a Lysinibacillus xylaniticus Ap282, Rhodotorula glutinis Lv316 y quitina (10 mg L-1) por presentar una eficacia del 49% al 69% en el control de la enfermedad. El bioensayo se repitió, adicionando la quitina al tratamiento hidrotérmico y evaluando el control de la enfermedad a partir de infecciones quiescentes del patógeno, almacenando la fruta a 13 °C. La combinación del tratamiento hidrotérmico y el temperado de la fruta en la suspensión de AP282 presentó la mayor eficacia en el control de la antracnosis (84%) en frutos inoculados con el patógeno, mientras que, en el control de la enfermedad a partir de las infecciones quiescentes la combinación del tratamiento hidrotérmico adicionando la quitina o el temperado en suspensiones microbianas presentó una eficacia del 83 al 89%.spa
dc.description.productionsystemsMangospa
dc.description.scientificnameMangifera indica L.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifierhttp://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0185-33092021000200248&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=en
dc.identifier.doi10.18781/r.mex.fit.2102-1
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Corporación colombiana de investigación agropecuaria AGROSAVIAspa
dc.identifier.issn0185-3309
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Biblioteca Digital Agropecuaria de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12324/38912
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSociedad Mexicana de Fitopatologíaspa
dc.publisher.placeMéxicospa
dc.relation.citationendpage265
dc.relation.citationissue39
dc.relation.citationstartpage248
dc.relation.citationvolume39
dc.relation.ispartofjournalRevista Mexicana de Fitopatologíaspa
dc.relation.referencesAlvarado JR y Moreno LA. 2012. Acuerdo de competitivi dad cadena productiva del mango en Colombia. https:// sioc.minagricultura.gov.co/Mango/Normatividad/004%20 -%20D.C.%20-%20Acuerdo%20Competitividad%20Ca dena%20Mango.pdf. (Consulta, marzo 2021).spa
dc.relation.referencesArauz L. 2000. Mango anthracnose: Economic impact and current options for integrated management. Plant Disease 84(6): 600–611. https://doi.org/10.1094/ PDIS.2000.84.6.600spa
dc.relation.referencesAsmar S. 2021. Productores de mango del Magdalena recibie ron luz verde para exportar hacia Europa. Agronegocios. to establish and therefore, increase their protective ability during storage. CONCLUSIONS The combination of the hydrothermal treatment at 53 °C for 5 minutes with the addition of chitin at 10 mg L-1 or the later tempering of the mangoes in the suspensions of R. glutinis Lv316 or L. xylaniticus AP282 presented an efficacy between 83 and 89% in the control of anthracnose originated from the quiescent C. gloeosporioides infections, alternatives which may be considered in the postharvest treatment of the mango cv. Azúcar. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors wish to thank the Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural de Colombia and the Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria - AGROSAVIA for funding the project “Evaluation of prevention methods and tools to prevent anthracnose on the field and postharvest (First approach)” that allowed this research to be carried out. End of the English version https://www.agronegocios.co/agricultura/productores-de mango-del-magdalena-recibieron-luz-verde-para-expor tar-hacia-europa-3146069. (Consulta, marzo 2021)spa
dc.relation.referencesBan Z, Wei W, Yang X, Feng J, Guan J and Li L. 2015. Com bination of heat treatment and chitosan coating to improve postharvest quality of wolfberry (Lycium barbarum). In ternational Journal of Food Science and Technology 50(4): 1019–1025. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.12734spa
dc.relation.referencesBautista-Baños S, Hernández-Lauzardo AN, Velázquez-Del Valle MG, Hernández-López M, Ait Barka E, Bosquez Molina E and Wilson CL. 2006. Chitosan as a potential natural compound to control pre and postharvest diseases of horticultural commodities. Crop Protection 25(2): 108– 118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2005.03.010spa
dc.relation.referencesBautista-Rosales P, Calderon-Santoyo M, Servín-Villegas R, Ochoa-Álvarez N, Vázquez-Juárez R and Ragazzo-Sán chez J. 2014. Biocontrol action mechanisms of Cryptococ-cus laurentii on Colletotrichum gloeosporioides of mango. Crop Protection (65): 194–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cropro.2014.07.019spa
dc.relation.referencesCalvente V, Benuzzi D and de Tosetti M. 1999. Antagonistic action of siderophores from Rhodotorula glutinis upon the postharvest pathogen Penicillium expansum. Internatio nal Biodeterioration and Bioegradation 43(4): 167–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-8305(99)00046-3spa
dc.relation.referencesChechi A, Stahlecker J, Dowling ME and Schnabel G. 2019. Diversity in species composition and fungicide resistance profiles in Colletotrichum isolates from apples. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology (158): 18–24. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2019.04.002spa
dc.relation.referencesCorrales-Bernal A, Maldonado ME, Urango LA, Franco MC and Rojano BA. 2014. Mango de azúcar (Mangifera indi ca), variedad de Colombia: características antioxidantes, nutricionales y sensoriales. Revista chilena de nutrición 41(3): 312-318. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717- 75182014000300013spa
dc.relation.referencesCarrillo-Fasio JA, García-Estrada RS, Muy-Rangel MD, Sa ñudo-Barajas A, Márquez-Zequera I, Allende-Molar R. 2005. Control Biológico de Antracnosis [Colletotrichum gloeosporioides (Penz.) Penz. y Sacc.] y su Efecto en la Calidad Poscosecha del Mango (Mangifera indica L.) en Sinaloa, México. Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología 23: 24-32. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/612/61223104.pdfspa
dc.relation.referencesCorkidi G, Balderas-Ruíz KA, Taboada B, Serrano-Carreón L and Galindo E. 2006. Assessing mango anthracnose using a new three-dimensional image-analysis technique to quantify lesions on fruit. Plant Pathology 55(2): 250–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2005.01321.xspa
dc.relation.referencesDíaz-García A, García-Riaño J and Zapata-Narváez J. 2015. Improvement of sporulation conditions of a new strain of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens in liquid fermentation. Advan ces in Bioscience and Biotechnology 6 (4): 302-310. http:// dx.doi.org/10.4236/abb.2015.64029spa
dc.relation.referencesFallik E. 2004. Prestorage hot water treatments (immersion, rinsing and brushing). Postharvest Biology and Techno logy 32(2): 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharv bio.2003.10.005spa
dc.relation.referencesFallik E, Grinberg S, Alkalai S and Lurie S. 1996. The effec tiveness of postharvest hot water dipping on the control of grey and black moulds in sweet red pepper (Capsicum annuum). Plant Pathology 45(4): 644–649. https://doi. org/10.1046/j.1365-3059.1996.d01-175.xspa
dc.relation.referencesGámez RM, Rodríguez F, Bernal JF, Agarwala R, Landsman D and Mariño-Ramírez L. 2015. Genome sequence of the Banana plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Bacillus amyloliquefaciens BS006. Genome announcements 3(6): e01391-15. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.01391-15spa
dc.relation.referencesKamle M and Kumar P. 2016. Colletotrichum gloeosporioides: Pathogen of anthracnose disease in Mango (Mangifera in dica L.). In: Kumar P, Kumar GV, Kumar TA and Kamle M (Ed.). Current Trends in Plant Disease Diagnostics and Management Practices, Fungal Biology. 207–219. https:// doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27312-9_9spa
dc.relation.referencesKarabulut O and Baykal N. 2004. Integrated control of pos tharvest diseases of peaches with a yeast antagonist, hot water and modified atmosphere packaging. Crop Pro tection 23(5): 431–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cro pro.2003.09.012spa
dc.relation.referencesKoller M, Rayns F, Cubison S and Schmutz U. 2016. Guideli nes for Experimental Practice in Organic Greenhouse Hor ticulture. BioGreenhouse COST Action FA 1105. http:// dx.doi.org/10.18174/373581spa
dc.relation.referencesLastochkina O, Seifikalhor M, Aliniaeifard S, Baymiev A, Pusenkova L, Garipova S Kulabuhova D and Maksimov I. 2019. Bacillus spp: Efficient biotic strategy to control postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables. Plants 8(4): 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8040097spa
dc.relation.referencesLucas-Bautista JA, Bautista-Baños S, Ventura-Aguilar RI y Gómez-Ramírez M. 2019. Determinación de quitina en hongos postcosecha y de quitinasas en frutos de papaya ¨Maradol¨. Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología 37 (No. Esp. 1): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.18781/R.MEX.FIT.1902-3.spa
dc.relation.referencesLiu J, Sui Y, Wisniewski M, Droby S and Liu Y. 2013. Re view: Utilization of antagonistic yeasts to manage posthar vest fungal diseases of fruit. International Journal of Food Microbiology 167(2): 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijfoodmicro.2013.09.004spa
dc.relation.referencesMINAGRICULTURA. 2018. Mango. https://www.agronet. gov.co/Documents/13-MANGO_2017.pdf (Consulta di ciembre, 2020).spa
dc.relation.referencesMoreno CA, Zapata JA, Díaz A and Cotes AM. 2012. Selec tion of a Pichia onychis isolate for biological control of Botrytis cinerea based on its eco-physiological characte ristics. IOBC-WPRS Bulletin 78(2):229-233.spa
dc.relation.referencesNaureen Z, Rehman NU, Hussain H, Hussain J, Gilani SA, Al Housni SK, Mabood F, Khan AL, Farooq S, Abbas G and Harrasi AA. 2017. Exploring the potentials of Lysini bacillus sphaericus ZA9 for plant growth promotion and biocontrol activities against phytopathogenic fungi. Fron tiers in Microbiology (8):1477. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fmicb.2017.01477spa
dc.relation.referencesPerez M, Contreras L, Garnica N, Fernández-Zenoff M, Fa rías M, Sepulveda M, Ramallo J and Dib J. 2016. Nati ve killer yeasts as biocontrol agents of postharvest fungal diseases in lemons. PLoS ONE 11(10): 1–21. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165590spa
dc.relation.referencesPrusky D, Alkan N, Mengiste T and Fluhr R. 2013. Quies cent and necrotrophic lifestyle choice during postharvest disease development. Annual Review of Phytopatho logy 51(1): 155–176. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev phyto-082712-102349spa
dc.relation.referencesRungjindamai N. 2016. Isolation and evaluation of biocon trol agents in controlling anthracnose disease of mango in Thailand. Journal of Plant Protection Research 56(3): 306–311. https://doi.org/10.1515/jppr-2016-0034spa
dc.relation.referencesSchirra M, Dʹhallewin G, Ben‐yehoshua S and Fallik E. 2000. Host–pathogen interaction modulated by heat treatment. Postharvest Biology and Technology 21(1): 71–85. https:// doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(00)00166-6spa
dc.relation.referencesTrinidad-Ángel E, Ascencio-Valle FDJ, Ulloa OA, Ramírez Ramírez OC, Ragazzo-Sánchez JA, Calderón-Santoyo M and Bautista PU. 2017. Identificación y caracterización de Colletotrichum spp. causante de antracnosis en aguacate de Nayarit, México. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrí colas (19):3953-3964. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca. v0i19.664spa
dc.relation.referencesUsall J, Ippolito A, Sisquella M and Neri F. 2016. Physical treatments to control postharvest diseases of fresh fruits and vegetables. Postharvest Biology and Technology (122): 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2016.05.002spa
dc.relation.referencesVilaplana R, Pazmiño L and Valencia-Chamorro S. 2018. Control of anthracnose, caused by Colletotrichum mu sae, on postharvest organic banana by thyme oil. Posthar vest Biology and Technology (138): 56–63. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2017.12.008spa
dc.relation.referencesZapata J, Acosta C, Díaz A, Villamizar L and Cotes AM. 2011. Characterization of Rhodotorula glutinis and Pichia on ychis isolates with potential as biopesticides for contro lling Botrytis cinerea. Acta Horticulturae (905): 155–160. https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2011.905.16spa
dc.relation.referencesZapata J and Cotes AM. 2013. Eficacia de dos prototipos de bioplaguicida a base de Rhodotorula glutinis cepa LvCo7 y un bioplaguicida a base de Trichoderma koningiop sis cepa Th003 en el control de B. cinerea en cultivos de mora. Pp. 73–79. En: Zapata, J. (Ed.), Desarrollo de pro totipos de bioplaguicida a base de Rhodotorula glutinis LvCo7 para el control de Botrytis cinerea en cultivos de mora. Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agro pecuaria, Corpoica, Produmedios 79p. http://hdl.handle. net/20.500.12324/13072spa
dc.relation.referencesZhang H, Komla G, Castoria R, Tibiru M and Yang Q. 2017 Augmentation of biocontrol agents with physical methods against postharvest diseases of fruits and vegetables. Trends in Food Science & Technology (69): 36–45. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2017.08.020spa
dc.relation.referencesZhang H, Ma L, Turner M, Xu H, Zheng X, Dong Y and Jiang S. 2010. Salicylic acid enhances biocontrol efficacy of Rhodotorula glutinis against postharvest Rhizopus rot of strawberries and the possible mechanisms involved. Food Chemistry 122(3): 577–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fo odchem.2010.03.013spa
dc.relation.referencesZhang H, Wang L, Dong Y, Jiang S, Zhang H and Zheng X. 2008. Control of postharvest pear diseases using Rhodo torula glutinis and its effects on postharvest quality pa rameters. International Journal of Food Microbiology 126(1–2): 167–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmi cro.2008.05.01spa
dc.rightsAttribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
dc.sourceRevista mexicana de fitopatología; Vol. 39, Núm. 39 (2021):Revista mexicana de fitopatología (Abril);p. 248 -265.spa
dc.subject.agrovocMangífera índicaspa
dc.subject.agrovocGlomerella cingulataspa
dc.subject.agrovocEnfermedades de las plantasspa
dc.subject.agrovocTratamiento hidrotérmicospa
dc.subject.agrovocurihttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_4575
dc.subject.agrovocurihttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_32151
dc.subject.agrovocurihttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5962
dc.subject.agrovocurihttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_36195
dc.subject.faoEnfermedades de las plantas - H20spa
dc.subject.proposalefficacy; Colletotrichum gloeosporioides; hydrothermal treatment; quiescent infectionsspa
dc.subject.redFrutalesspa
dc.titleEficacia de antagonistas microbianos y quitina en el control de Colletotrichum gloeosporioides en poscosecha de mango cv. Azúcarspa
dc.title.translatedEfficacy of microbial antagonists and chitin in the control of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides in postharvest of mango cv. Azúcareng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.localArtículo científicospa
dc.type.localengarticleeng
dc.type.redcolhttps://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Ver_Documento_38912.pdf
Tamaño:
854.19 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: