¿Cómo influye la diversificación de los ingresos rurales en la eficiencia técnica agrícola de los pequeños agricultores? Evidencia de Colombia

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.audienceInvestigadorspa
dc.audience.contentCientíficospa
dc.contributor.authorPolo Murcia, Sonia Mercedes
dc.contributor.authorTeran Chaves, Cesar Augusto
dc.coverage.countryColombiaspa
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-19T13:01:18Z
dc.date.available2024-01-19T13:01:18Z
dc.date.created2022
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractEn este estudio se estima el efecto del ingreso rural no agrícola (IRNA) sobre la eficiencia técnica (ET) de los hogares de pequeños productores agropecuarios en cuatro regiones de Colombia. Se utiliza el enfoque estocástico de meta-frontera que permite considerar la heterogeneidad regional. Los resultados sugieren que los hogares rurales en todas las regiones utilizan la tecnología disponible de manera subóptima. En la meta-frontera los resultados evidencian un efecto negativo y significativo sobre la ET; el efecto se debilita conforme aumenta la participación del IRNA en el ingreso total del hogar, la ET puede disminuir entre 8.8% y 43% (significancia del 5%).spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifierhttps://estudiosrurales.unq.edu.ar/index.php/ER/article/view/441
dc.identifier.doi10.48160/22504001er25.441
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Corporación colombiana de investigación agropecuaria AGROSAVIAspa
dc.identifier.issn2250-4001
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Biblioteca Digital Agropecuaria de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12324/38774
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad Nacional de Quilmesspa
dc.publisher.placeBernal (Argentina)spa
dc.relation.citationendpage19
dc.relation.citationissue25
dc.relation.citationstartpage1
dc.relation.citationvolume12
dc.relation.ispartofjournalEstudios Ruralesspa
dc.relation.referencesAbdulai, A., & Huffman, W. (2000). Structural Adjustment and Economic Efficiency of Rice Farmers in Northern Ghana. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 48(3), 503–520. https://doi.org/10.1086/452608spa
dc.relation.referencesAl-Amin, A. A., & Hossain, M. (2019). Impact of non-farm income on welfare in rural Bangladesh: Multilevel mixed effects regression approach. World Development Perspectives, 13, 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2019 .02.014spa
dc.relation.referencesAlem, H., Lien, G., Hardaker, J. B., & Guttormsen, A. (2018). Regional differences in technical efficiency and technological gap of Norwegian dairy farms: a stochastic meta-frontier model. Applied Economics, 51(4), 409– 421. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2018.1502867spa
dc.relation.referencesAlmeida, A. N., & Bravo-Ureta, B. E. (2019). Agricultural productivity, shadow wages and off-farm labor decisions in Nicaragua. Economic Systems, 43(1), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2018.09.002spa
dc.relation.referencesAmare, M., & Shiferaw, B. (2017). Nonfarm employment, agricultural intensification, and productivity change: empirical findings from Uganda. Agricultural Economics, 48(S1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12386spa
dc.relation.referencesBojnec, T., & Latruffe, L. (2009). Determinants of technical efficiency of Slovenian farms. Post-Communist Economies, 21(1), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631370802663737spa
dc.relation.referencesDethier, J. J., & Effenberger, A. (2012). Agriculture and development: A brief review of the literature. Economic Systems, 36(2), 175–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2011.09.003spa
dc.relation.referencesDepartamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística (DANE). 2014. Uso, cobertura y tenencia del suelo: 3er censo nacional agropecuario 2014. (Consultado en línea el 27 de abril de 2020).spa
dc.relation.referencesGoodwin, B. K., & Mishra, A. K. (2004). Farming Efficiency and the Determinants of Multiple Job Holding by Farm Operators. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86(3), 722–729. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0002-9092 .2004.00614.xspa
dc.relation.referencesHeckman, J. J. (1978). Dummy Endogenous Variables in a Simultaneous Equation System. Econometrica, 46(4), 931. https://doi.org/10.2307/1909757spa
dc.relation.referencesHuang, C. J., Huang, T. H., & Liu, N. H. (2014). A new approach to estimating the metafrontier production function based on a stochastic frontier framework. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 42(3), 241–254. https://doi.org/10 .1007/s11123-014-0402-2spa
dc.relation.referencesKilic, T., Carletto, C., Miluka, J., & Savastano, S. (2009). Rural nonfarm income and its impact on agriculture: evidence from Albania. Agricultural Economics, 40(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2009.00366.xspa
dc.relation.referencesKumbhakar, S. C., Lien, G., & Hardaker, J. B. (2012). Technical efficiency in competing panel data models: a study of Norwegian grain farming. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 41(2), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1112 3-012-0303-1spa
dc.relation.referencesLien, G., Kumbhakar, S. C., & Hardaker, J. B. (2010). Determinants of off-farm work and its effects on farm performance: the case of Norwegian grain farmers. Agricultural Economics, 41(6), 577–586. https://doi.org/1 0.1111/j.1574-0862.2010.00473.xspa
dc.relation.referencesLien, G., Kumbhakar, S. C., & Alem, H. (2018). Endogeneity, heterogeneity, and determinants of inefficiency in Norwegian crop-producing farms. International Journal of Production Economics, 201, 53–61. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.04.023spa
dc.relation.referencesLiu, Z., & Zhuang, J. (2000). Determinants of Technical Efficiency in Post-Collective Chinese Agriculture: Evidence from Farm-Level Data. Journal of Comparative Economics, 28(3), 545–564. https://doi.org/10.1006/jcec.200 0.1666spa
dc.relation.referencesMathenge, M. K., & Tschirley, D. L. (2015). Off-farm labor market decisions and agricultural shocks among rural households in Kenya. Agricultural Economics, 46(5), 603–616. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12157spa
dc.relation.referencesMelo-Becerra, L. A., & Orozco-Gallo, A. J. (2016). Technical efficiency for Colombian small crop and livestock farmers: A stochastic metafrontier approach for different production systems. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 47(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-016-0487-xspa
dc.relation.referencesPfeiffer, L., López-Feldman, A., & Taylor, J. E. (2009). Is off-farm income reforming the farm? Evidence from Mexico. Agricultural Economics, 40(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2009.00365.xspa
dc.relation.referencesPhimister, E., & Roberts, D. (2006). e Effect of Off-farm Work on the Intensity of Agricultural Production. Environmental and Resource Economics, 34(4), 493–515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-006-0012-1spa
dc.relation.referencesPurdy, B. M., Langemeier, M. R., & Featherstone, A. M. (1997). Financial Performance, Risk, and Specialization. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 29(1), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1017/s107407080000763xspa
dc.relation.referencesSemykina, A., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Estimating panel data models in the presence of endogeneity and selection. Journal of Econometrics, 157(2), 375–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2010.03.039spa
dc.relation.referencesShi, X., Heerink, N., & Qu, F. (2007). Choices between different off-farm employment sub-categories: An empirical analysis for Jiangxi Province, China. China Economic Review, 18(4), 438–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chie co.2006.08.001spa
dc.relation.referencesShittu, A. M. (2014). Off-farm labour supply and production efficiency of farm household in rural Southwest Nigeria. Agricultural and Food Economics, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-014-0008-zspa
dc.relation.referencesSkevas, T., Lansink, A. O., & Stefanou, S. E. (2012). Measuring technical efficiency in the presence of pesticide spillovers and production uncertainty: e case of Dutch arable farms. European Journal of Operational Research, 223(2), 550–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.06.034spa
dc.relation.referencesSipiläinen, T., Kumbhakar, S. C., & Lien, G. (2013). Performance of dairy farms in Finland and Norway from 1991 to 2008. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 41(1), 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbt012spa
dc.relation.referencesVella, F., & Verbeek, M. (1999). Two-step estimation of panel data models with censored endogenous variables and selection bias. Journal of Econometrics, 90(2), 239–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4076(98)00043-8spa
dc.relation.referencesWan, J., Li, R., Wang, W., Liu, Z., & Chen, B. (2016b). Income Diversification: A Strategy for Rural Region Risk Management. Sustainability, 8(10), 1064. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8101064spa
dc.relation.referencesWei SI. (2011). Productivity growth, technical efficiency, and technical change in China’s soybean production. Aican Journal Of Agricultural Research, 6(25). https://doi.org/10.5897/ajar11.1080spa
dc.relation.referencesWoldeyohanes, T., Heckelei, T., & Surry, Y. (2016). Effect of off-farm income on smallholder commercialization: panel evidence from rural households in Ethiopia. Agricultural Economics, 48(2), 207–218. https://doi.org/10 .1111/agec.12327spa
dc.relation.referencesWooldridge, J. M. (2015). Control Function Methods in Applied Econometrics. Journal of Human Resources, 50(2), 420–445. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.50.2.420spa
dc.relation.referencesZhang, L., Su, W., Eriksson, T., & Liu, C. (2016). How Off-farm Employment Affects Technical Efficiency of China’s Farms: e Case of Jiangsu. China & World Economy, 24(3), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12157spa
dc.rightsAttribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/*
dc.sourceEstudios Rurales; Vol. 12, Núm,. 25 (2022): Estudios Rurales (Enero-Junio);p. 1 -19.spa
dc.subject.agrovocPequeños agricultoresspa
dc.subject.agrovocDiversificación económicaspa
dc.subject.agrovocRentaspa
dc.subject.agrovocTecnologíaspa
dc.subject.agrovocurihttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_14343
dc.subject.agrovocurihttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_ee2962b7
dc.subject.agrovocurihttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_3820
dc.subject.agrovocurihttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7644
dc.subject.faoEconomía de la producción - E16spa
dc.subject.redTransversalspa
dc.title¿Cómo influye la diversificación de los ingresos rurales en la eficiencia técnica agrícola de los pequeños agricultores? Evidencia de Colombiaspa
dc.title.translatedHow Rural Income Diversification Influence AgriculturalTechnical Efficiency Of Smallholder Farmers? Evidence From Colombiaeng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.localArtículo científicospa
dc.type.localengarticleeng
dc.type.redcolhttps://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
Ver_Documento_38774.pdf
Tamaño:
612.03 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Artículos científicos