Crop photoperiodism model 2.0 for the flowering time of sorghum and rice that includes daily changes in sunrise and sunset times and temperature acclimation

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.audienceInvestigadorspa
dc.audience.contentCientíficospa
dc.contributor.authorClerget, B
dc.contributor.authorSidibe, M
dc.contributor.authorBueno, C S
dc.contributor.authorGrenier, C
dc.contributor.authorKawakata, T
dc.contributor.authorDomingo, A J
dc.contributor.authorLayaoen, H L
dc.contributor.authorGutierrez Palacios, N D
dc.contributor.authorBernal-Riobo, Jaime Humberto
dc.contributor.authorTrouche, G
dc.contributor.authorChantereau, J
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-21T15:35:35Z
dc.date.available2024-02-21T15:35:35Z
dc.date.created2021-04-04
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractDaylength determines flowering dates. However, questions remain regarding flowering dates in the natural environment, such as the synchronous flowering of plants sown simultaneously at highly contrasting latitudes. The daily change in sunrise and sunset times is the cue for the flowering of trees and for the synchronization of moulting in birds at the equator. Sunrise and sunset also synchronize the cell circadian clock, which is involved in the regulation of flowering. The goal of this study was to update the photoperiodism model with knowledge acquired since its conception.A large dataset was gathered, including four 2-year series of monthly sowings of 28 sorghum varieties in Mali and two 1-year series of monthly sowings of eight rice varieties in the Philippines to compare with previously published monthly sowings in Japan and Malaysia, and data from sorghum breeders in France, Nicaragua and Colombia. An additive linear model of the duration in days to panicle initiation (PI) and flowering time using daylength and daily changes in sunrise and sunset times was implemented. Simultaneous with the phyllochron, the duration to PI of field crops acclimated to the mean temperature at seedling emergence within the usual range of mean cropping temperatures. A unique additive linear model combining daylength and daily changes in sunrise and sunset hours was accurately fitted for any type of response in the duration to PI to the sowing date without any temperature input. Once calibrated on a complete and an incomplete monthly sowing series at two tropical latitudes, the model accurately predicted the duration to PI of the concerned varieties from the equatorial to the temperate zone.Including the daily changes in sunrise and sunset times in the updated photoperiodism model largely improved its accuracy at the latitude of each experiment. More research is needed to ascertain its multi-latitudinal accuracy, especially at latitudes close to the equator.spa
dc.description.productionsystemsArrozspa
dc.description.productionsystemsSorgospa
dc.description.scientificnameOryza sativa
dc.description.scientificnamesorgos - Sorghum bicolor
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcab048
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/aob/mcab048
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Corporación colombiana de investigación agropecuaria AGROSAVIAspa
dc.identifier.issn0305-7364
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Biblioteca Digital Agropecuaria de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12324/38910
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherOxford University Pressspa
dc.publisher.placeOxford (Reino Unido)spa
dc.relation.citationendpage107
dc.relation.citationissue1
dc.relation.citationstartpage97
dc.relation.citationvolume128
dc.relation.ispartofjournalAnnals of Botanyspa
dc.relation.referencesAbdulai AL, Kouressy M, Vaksmann M, Asch F, Giese M, Holger B. 2012. Latitude and date of sowing influences phenology of photoperiod-sensitive sorghums. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 198: 340–348spa
dc.relation.referencesAhmad M, Cashmore AR. 1993. HY4 gene of A. thaliana encodes a pro tein with characteristics of a blue-light photoreceptor. Nature 366: 162–166spa
dc.relation.referencesBarak S, Tobin EM, Andronis C, Sugano S, Green RM. 2000. All in good time: the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Trends in Plant Science 5: 517–522spa
dc.relation.referencesBezot P. 1963. L’amélioration des sorghos au Tchad. Agronomie Tropicale 18: 985–1007spa
dc.relation.referencesBirch CJ, Vos J, Kiniry J, Bos HJ, Elings A. 1998. Phyllochron responds to acclimation to temperature and irradiance in maize. Field Crops Research 59: 187–200spa
dc.relation.referencesBorchert R, Renner SS, Calle Z, et al. 2005. Photoperiodic induction of syn chronous flowering near the Equator. Nature 433: 627–629spa
dc.relation.referencesCarberry PS, Muchow RC, Williams R, Sturtz JD, McCow RL. 1992. A simulation model of kenaf for assisting fibre industry planning in northern Australia. I. General introduction and phenological model. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 43: 1501–1513.spa
dc.relation.referencesCarberry PS, Ranganathan R, Reddy LJ, Chauhan YS, Robertson MJ. 2001. Predicting growth and development of pigeonpea: flowering re sponse to photoperiod. Field Crops Research 69: 151–162.spa
dc.relation.referencesClerget B, Dingkuhn M, Chantereau J, Hemberger J, Louarn G, Vaksmann M. 2004. Does panicle initiation in tropical sorghum depend on day-to-day change in photoperiod? Field Crops Research 88: 11–27spa
dc.relation.referencesClerget B, Dingkuhn M, Gozé E, Rattunde HF, Ney B. 2008. Variability of phyllochron, plastochron and rate of increase in height in photoperiod sensitive sorghum varieties. Annals of Botany 101: 579–594spa
dc.relation.referencesClerget B, Rattunde HFW, Weltzien E. 2012. Why tropical sorghum sown in winter months has delayed flowering and modified morphogenesis in spite of prevailing short days. Field Crops Research 125: 139–150.spa
dc.relation.referencesCollinson ST, Ellis RH, Summerfield RJ, Roberts EH. 1992. Durations of the photoperiod-sensitive and photoperiod-insensitive phases of develop ment to flowering in four cultivars of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Annals of Botany 70: 339–346spa
dc.relation.referencesCurtis DL. 1968. The relationship between the date of heading of Nigerian sorghums and the duration of growing season. Journal of Applied Ecology 5: 215–226.spa
dc.relation.referencesDeu M, Rattunde F, Chantereau J. 2006. A global view of genetic diversity in cultivated sorghums using a core collection. Genome 49: 168–180spa
dc.relation.referencesDingkuhn M, Sow A, Samb A, Diack S, Asch F. 1995. Climatic determinants of irrigated rice performance in the Sahel. 1. Photothermal and micro climatic responses of flowering. Agricultural Systems 48: 385–410spa
dc.relation.referencesDingkuhn M, Kouressy M, Vaksmann M, Clerget B, Chantereau J. 2008. A model of sorghum photoperiodism using the concept of threshold lowering during prolonged appetence. European Journal of Agronomy 28: 74–89spa
dc.relation.referencesDingkuhn M, Sow A, Manneh B, et al. 2015. Field phenomics for response of a rice diversity panel to ten environments in Senegal and Madagascar. 1. Plant phenological traits. Field Crops Research 183: 342–355spa
dc.relation.referencesDittami JP, Gwinner E. 1985. Annual cycles in the African stonechat Saxicola torquata axillaris and their relationship to environmental factors. Journal of Zoology, London 207: 357–370.spa
dc.relation.referencesDore J. 1959. Response of rice to small differences in length of day. Nature 183: 413–414spa
dc.relation.referencesEllis RH, Collinson ST, Hudson D, Patefield WM. 1992. The analysis of re ciprocal transfer experiments to estimate the durations of the photoperiod sensitive and photoperiod-insensitive phases of plant development: an example in soya bean. Annals of Botany 70: 87–92spa
dc.relation.referencesFolliard A, Traore PCS, Vaksmann M, Kouressy M. 2004. Modeling of sor ghum response to photoperiod: a threshold–hyperbolic approach. Field Crops Research 89: 59–70.spa
dc.relation.referencesGoymann W, Helm B, Jensen W, Schwabl I, Moore IT. 2012. A tropical bird can use the equatorial change in sunrise and sunset times to synchronize its circannual clock. Proceedings. Biological Sciences 279: 3527–3534.spa
dc.relation.referencesGrenier C, Hamon P, Bramel-Cox PJ. 2001. Core collection of sorghum: I. Stratification based on eco-geographical data. Crop Science 41: 234–240.spa
dc.relation.referencesGwinner E, Scheuerlein A. 1998. Seasonal changes in day-light intensity as a potential zeitgeber of circannual rhythms in equatorial stonechats. Journal of Ornithology 139: 407–412.spa
dc.relation.referencesGwinner E, Scheuerlein A. 1999. Photoperiodic responsiveness of equatorial and temperate-zone stonechats. Condor 10: 347–359.spa
dc.relation.referencesHemberger J. 2001. Effets de la photopériode sur le plastochrone, le phyllochrone et la date d’initiation paniculaire de trois variétés de sorgho de race caudatum et guinea. MSc Thesis, Université de Corse, Francespa
dc.relation.referencesKawakata T, Yajima M. 1995. Modeling flowering time of rice plants under natural photoperiod and constant air-temperature. Agronomy Journal 87: 393–396.spa
dc.relation.referencesKinmonth-Schultz HA, MacEwen MJS, Seaton DD, Millar AJ, Imaizumi T, Kim S-H. 2019. An explanatory model of temperature influence on flowering through whole-plant accumulation of FLOWERING LOCUS T in Arabidopsis thaliana. in silico Plants 1: 1–22.spa
dc.relation.referencesKirby EJM, Appleyard M, Fellowes G. 1985. Leaf emergence and tillering in barley and wheat. Agronomie 5: 193–200spa
dc.relation.referencesKlebs G. 1913. Über das Verhältnis der Aussenwelt zur Entwicklung der Pflanzen. Sitzungsberichte der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften 5: 1–47spa
dc.relation.referencesLafarge T. 1998. Analyse de la mise en place de la surface foliaire du sorgho grain (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) au champ. PhD Thesis, Université d’Orsay-Paris11, Francespa
dc.relation.referencesLaureanno T. 1992. Sunrise/sunset algorithms for home automation. http:// www.laureanno.com/x10-sun.html; last accessed 18 May 2021.spa
dc.relation.referencesMajor DJ. 1980. Photoperiod response characteristics controlling flowering of nine crop species. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 60: 777–784.spa
dc.relation.referencesMiller FR, Barnes DK, Cruzado HJ. 1968. Effect of tropical photoperiods on the growth of sorghum when grown in 12 monthly plantings. Crop Science 8: 499–502.spa
dc.relation.referencesRamírez F, Davenport TL, Fischer G. 2010. The number of leaves required for floral induction and translocation of the florigenic promoter in mango (Mangifera indica L.) in a tropical climate. Scientia Horticulturae 123: 443–453.spa
dc.relation.referencesRoberts EH, Carpenter AJ. 1965. The interaction of photoperiod and tem perature on the flowering response of rice. Annals of Botany 29: 359–364spa
dc.relation.referencesSAS. 2012. SAS Online® 9.4. Cary, NC, USA: SAS Institutespa
dc.relation.referencesScheuerlein A, Gwinner E. 2002. Is food availability a circannual zeitgeber in tropical birds? A field experiment on stonechats in tropical Africa. Journal of Biological Rhythms 17: 171–180spa
dc.relation.referencesShim JS, Jang G. 2020. Environmental signal-dependent regulation of flowering time in rice. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21: 1–15.spa
dc.relation.referencesSié M, Dingkuhn M, Wopereis MCS, Miezan KM. 1998. Rice crop duration and leaf appearance rate in a variable thermal environment. I. Development of an empirically based model. Field Crops Research 57: 1–13.spa
dc.relation.referencesSummerfield RJ, Collinson ST, Ellis RH, Roberts EH, De Vries FWTP. 1992. Photothermal responses of flowering in rice (Oryza sativa). Annals of Botany 69: 101–112spa
dc.relation.referencesSummerfield RJ, Ellis RH, Craufurd PQ, Aiming Q, Robert EH, Wheeler TR. 1997. Environmental and genetic regulation of flowering of tropical annual crops. Euphytica 96: 83–91.spa
dc.relation.referencesThomas B, Vince-Prue D. 1997. Photoperiodism in plants. New York: Academic Pressspa
dc.relation.referencesTournois J. 1912. Influence de la lumière sur la floraison du houblon japonais et du chanvre déterminée par des semis hâtifs. Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des séances de l’Académie des sciences 155: 297–300.spa
dc.relation.referencesVergara BS, Chang TT. 1985. The flowering response of the rice plant to photoperiod: a review of the literature, 4th edn. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute.spa
dc.relation.referencesWallace DH, Gniffke PA, Massaya PN, Zobel RW. 1991. Photoperiod, tem perature, and genotype interaction effects on days and nodes required for flowering of bean. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 116: 534–543.spa
dc.relation.referencesYoshida S. 1981. Fundamentals of rice crop science. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institutespa
dc.rightsAttribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/*
dc.sourceAnnals of Botany; Vol. 128, Núm. 1 (2021): Annals of Botany;p. 97 -113.spa
dc.subject.agrovocOryza sativaspa
dc.subject.agrovocAclimataciónspa
dc.subject.agrovocFloraciónspa
dc.subject.agrovocFotoperiodismospa
dc.subject.agrovocurihttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5438
dc.subject.agrovocurihttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_8589
dc.subject.agrovocurihttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_2992
dc.subject.agrovocurihttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_5809
dc.subject.faoArreglo y sistemas de cultivo - F08spa
dc.subject.redTransitoriosspa
dc.titleCrop photoperiodism model 2.0 for the flowering time of sorghum and rice that includes daily changes in sunrise and sunset times and temperature acclimationspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.localArtículo científicospa
dc.type.localengarticleeng
dc.type.redcolhttps://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
Ver_Documento_38910.pdf
Tamaño:
1.55 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Artículos científicos