Intrapopulation phenotypic variation in Piartal (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) from the Department of Boyacá, Colombia

dc.audienceInvestigadorspa
dc.audience.contentCientíficospa
dc.contributor.authorCruz Morillo, Ana
dc.contributor.authorManjarres Hernandez, Elsa Helena
dc.contributor.authorLorena R, Wendy
dc.contributor.authorMorillo Coronado, Yacenia
dc.coverage.countryColombiaspa
dc.coverage.departmentBoyacáspa
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-31T13:25:55Z
dc.date.available2024-07-31T13:25:55Z
dc.date.created2020-08
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractChenopodium quinoa Willd., is an interesting plant with a great adaptation to adverse environmental factors and exceptional nutritional qualities. It shows great genetic variation, which organization remains poorly documented. In Boyacá, there are few studies on the morphological characterization of cultivated materials, and there is no certified planting material, resulting that the farmers are planting a mixture of materials. Qualitative and quantitative descriptors and principal component and cluster analyses were used to characterize the structure of the intra-population phenotypic variation in Piartal quinoa materials grown in the Department of Boyacá. It was observed that the first two components, CP1 and CP2, explained more than 70% of the total observed phenotypic variation, and there was a significant contribution from all variables to the two components, except those related to the lower leaves, where P2, P3 and P4 presented defoliation and DP (CP2 and P6). The cluster analysis showed that the individuals of the Piartal were grouped mainly by morphological characteristics associated with plant height, panicle length, pigmented axillae, and leaf characteristics. Results showed that the variance in morpho-phenological traits was concentrated at the intra-population, due the high variation at the inter-individual level. A more efficient selection process should be carried out to find "pure" varieties.spa
dc.description.productionsystemsQuinua-Amaranthus caudatusspa
dc.description.sponsorshipFondo Francisco José de Caldas - (FFJC)spa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifierhttps://academicjournals.org/journal/AJAR/article-abstract/28F652564613
dc.identifier.doi10.5897/AJAR2020.14916
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Corporación colombiana de investigación agropecuaria AGROSAVIAspa
dc.identifier.issn1991-637X
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Biblioteca Digital Agropecuaria de Colombiaspa
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12324/39724
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherAcademic Journalsspa
dc.publisher.placeLagos (Nigeria)spa
dc.relation.citationendpage1203
dc.relation.citationissue8
dc.relation.citationstartpage1195
dc.relation.citationvolume16
dc.relation.ispartofjournalAfrican Journal of Agricultural Researchspa
dc.relation.referencesAfiah SA, Wafaa AH, Al Kady AM (2018). Assessment of six quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) genotypes for seed yield and its attributes under Toshka conditions. Plant Production Science 45(6):2281-2294.spa
dc.relation.referencesAGRONET. Cifras agropecuarias (online) (2020). Disponible en: https://www.agronet.gov.co/estadistica/Paginas/home.aspx?cod=1spa
dc.relation.referencesAlanoca C, Machaca E (2017). Caracterización agromorfológica de 10 accesiones y variedades de quinua (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) en condiciones del Valle Alto de Cochabamba. Revista Científica de Investigación INFO-INIAF 1(5):21-29.spa
dc.relation.referencesAli OI, Fghire R, Fghire R, Anaya F, Benhalblb O, Wahbl S (2019). Physiological and morphological responses of two quinoa cultivars (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to drought stress. Gesunde Pflanzen 71(1):1-11.spa
dc.relation.referencesAl-Naggar AMM, El-Salam RMA, Badran AEE, Boulos ST, El-Moghazi MAM (2018). Heritability and genetic advance from selection for morphological, biochemical and anatomical traits of Chenopodium quinoa under water stress. Bionature 38(2):66-85.spa
dc.relation.referencesAlvarez R, Nguyen AN, Peredo S, Joffre R, Winkel T (2018). Rooting plasticity in wild and cultivated Andean Chenopodium species under soil water deficit. Plant Soil 425:479-492.spa
dc.relation.referencesBazile D (2014). Contesting Blossoming Treasures of Biodiversity article 42: „Quinoa - is the United Nation‟s featured crop of 2013 bad for biodiversity?‟ - Quinoa, a model crop to examine the dynamics of biodiversity within agricultural systems. Biodiversity 15(1):3-4.spa
dc.relation.referencesChura E, Mujica A, Haussmann B, Smith K, Flores S, Flores AL (2019). Agronomic characterization of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) progeny from close and distant self-fertilized S5 simple crosses. Ciencia e Investigación Agraria 46(2):154-165.spa
dc.relation.referencesCurti RN, De la Vega AJ, Andrade AJ, Bramardi SJ, Bertero HD (2014). Multi-environmental evaluation for grain yield and its physiological determinants of quinoa genotypes across Northwest Argentina. Field Crops Research 166(1):46-57.spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Santis G, Ronga D, Caradonia F, Ambrosio D, Troisi J, Rascio A, Fragasso M, Pecchioni N, Rinaldi M (2018). Evaluation of two groups of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) accessions with different seed colours for adaption to the Mediterranean environment. Crop and Pasture Science 69:1264-1275.spa
dc.relation.referencesDelatorre J, Sánchez M, Delfino I, Oliva MI (2013). La quinua (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.), un tesoro andino para el mundo. Idesia 31(2):111-114.spa
dc.relation.referencesDel Castillo CR, Winkel T (2014). Variación fenotípica intra- e interpoblaciones en siete poblaciones de quinua del altiplano boliviano. Revista de Investigación e Innovación Agropecuaria y de Recursos Naturales 1(1):58-64.spa
dc.relation.referencesDelgado AI, Palacios JH, Betancourt C (2009). Evaluación de 16 genotipos de quinua dulce (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) en el municipio de Iles, Nariño (Colombia). Agronomía Colombiana 27(2):159-167.spa
dc.relation.referencesEl Hazzam K, Hafsa J, Sobeh M, Mhada M, Taourirte M, El Kacimi K, Yasri A (2020). An insight into saponins from quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): A review. Molecules 25(5):1059-1080.spa
dc.relation.referencesEbrahim MEA, Hussin SA, Abdel-Ati AA, Ali SH, Eisa SS (2018). Evaluation of some Chenopodium quinoa cultivars under saline soil conditions in Egypt. Arab Universities Journal of Agricultural Sciences 26(1):337.347.spa
dc.relation.referencesFarooq MA, Aziz S, Aziz A, Javaid M, Muhammad H, Wasaya A, Ahmad T, Wahid A (2018). Morphological features of different accessions of Chenopodium quinoa. Pure and Applied Biology 7(1):374-383.spa
dc.relation.referencesGarcía MA, García JF, Carvajal DC, (2018). Evaluación del efecto de la fertilización química y orgánica en la composición bromatológica de semillas de quinua (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) en Boyacá- Colombia. Revista de Investigación Agraria y Ambiental 9(2):99-107.spa
dc.relation.referencesHinojosa L, González JA, Barrios-Masias FH, Fuentes F, Murphy K, (2018). Quinoa abiotic stress responses: A review. Plants 7(4):106- 138.spa
dc.relation.referencesInfante RH, Albesiano S, Arrieta L, Gómez N (2018). Morphological characterization of varieties of Chenopodium quinoa cultivated in the Department of Boyacá, Colombia. Revista UDCA Actualidad y Divulgación Científica 21(2):1-12.spa
dc.relation.referencesMadrid D, Salgado E, Verdugo G, Olguín P, Bilalis D, Fuentes F (2018). Morphological traits defining breeding criteria for coastal quinoa in Chile. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 46(1):190- 196.spa
dc.relation.referencesMaliro FA, Njala LA (2019). Agronomic performance and strategies of promoting Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) in Malawi. Ciencia e Investigación Agraria 46(2):82-99.spa
dc.relation.referencesMishra S, Srivastava AK, Verma S, Pandey S, Bargali SS, Rana TS, Nair NK (2017). Phenetic and genetic diversity in Indian Luffa (Cucurbitaceae) inferred from morphometric, ISSR and DAMD markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 64(5):995-1010.spa
dc.relation.referencesMorillo AC, Manjarres EH, Morillo Y (2020). Evaluación morfoagronómica de 19 materiales de Chenopodium quinoa en el departamento de Boyacá. Biotecnología en el Sector Agropecuario y Agroindustrial 18(1):84-96.spa
dc.relation.referencesMorillo AC, Manjarres EH, Morillo Y (2017). Molecular characterization of Chenopodium quinoa Willd. using inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. African Journal of Biotechnology 16(10):483-489.spa
dc.relation.referencesNoulas C, Tziouvalekas M, Vlachostergios D, Baxevanos D, Karyotis T, Iliadis C (2017). Adaptation, agronomic potential, and current perspectives of quinoa under Mediterranean conditions: case studies from the lowlands of central Greece. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 48(22):2612-2629.spa
dc.relation.referencesPereira E, Zelada CE, Barros L, Barron U, Cadavez V, Ferreira IC (2019). Chemical and nutritional characterization of Chenopodium quinoa Willd (quinoa) grains: A good alternative to nutritious food. Food Chemistry 280:110-114.spa
dc.relation.referencesRojas W, Pinto M, Alanoca C, Gómez L, León P, Alercia A, Diulgheroff S, Padulosi S, Bazile D (2015). Quinua Genetics Resources and ex situ conservation. Chapter 1.5. Roma (Italia): FAO and CIRAD, State of the Art Report of Quinoa in the World in 2015. pp. 56-82.spa
dc.relation.referencesRuíz KB, Biondi S, Oses R, Acuña IS, Antognoni F, Martínez EA, Coulibaly A, Canahua AC, Pinto M, Zurita A, Bazile D, Jacobsen SE, Molina MA (2014). Quinoa biodiversity and sustainability for food security under climate change: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 34(2):349-359.spa
dc.relation.referencesSpehar C, Santos R (2005). Agronomic performance of Quinoa selected in the Brazilian Savannah. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 40(6):609-612.spa
dc.relation.referencesVeloza C, Romero G, Gómez J (2016). Morphoagronomic response and protein quality of three accessions of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) in the northern Sabana of Bogotá. Revista UDCA Actualidad y Divulgación Científica 9(2):325-332.spa
dc.relation.referencesZurita A, Fuentes F, Zamora P, Jacobsen SE, Schwember AR (2014). Breeding quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): Potential and perspectives. Molecular Breeding 34(1):13-30.spa
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.sourceAfrican Journal of Agricultural Research; Vol. 16, Núm. 8 (2020): African Journal of Agricultural Research (August);p. 1195-1203.spa
dc.subject.agrovocChenopodium quinoaspa
dc.subject.agrovocVariación genéticaspa
dc.subject.agrovocMejoramiento genéticospa
dc.subject.agrovocMorfologíaspa
dc.subject.agrovocurihttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1531
dc.subject.agrovocurihttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_15975
dc.subject.agrovocurihttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_11119
dc.subject.agrovocurihttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_49903
dc.subject.faoGenética vegetal y fitomejoramiento - F30spa
dc.subject.redTransitoriosspa
dc.titleIntrapopulation phenotypic variation in Piartal (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) from the Department of Boyacá, Colombiaspa
dc.title.translatedIntrapopulation phenotypic variation in Piartal (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) from the Department of Boyacá, Colombiaeng
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.localArtículo científicospa
dc.type.localengarticleeng
dc.type.redcolhttps://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ART
dc.type.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Ver_Documento_39724.pdf
Tamaño:
332.74 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: