Estimating the future with the Sustainability assessment methodology to soil-associated agricultural experiments

dc.audienceInvestigadorspa
dc.audience.contentCientíficospa
dc.contributor.authorHoogenboom, Gerrit
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-Roa, Andrea Onelia
dc.contributor.authorCastillo Romero, Oscar Gonzalo
dc.contributor.authorMonsalve Camacho, Oscar Iván
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-29T17:36:56Z
dc.date.available2025-08-29T17:36:56Z
dc.date.created2025
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractAgricultural sustainability assessments have gained high importance during the last decades. Different tools have been developed for these assessments such as the Sustainability assessment methodology oriented to soil-associated agricultural experiments (SMAES). SMAES quantifies the current sustainability of the different treatments evaluated in experiments associated with the soil. However, efforts aimed to maintain or increase the crop systems sustainability must be planned and measured in the short, medium, and long-term. In this work, some parameters are added to SMAES to estimate the future sustainability. The first parameter is the construction of climate scenarios (RCP 4.5 and 8.5, model CCSM4, periods 2050-2100) to establish the conditions of change in the future. Second, crop yield is modelled with DSSAT (Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer) using the aforementioned climate scenarios. Third, yield modelling results and SMAES sustainability indexes (IS) from climate scenarios are integrated. As a case of study, the current sustainability (IS-A) of five potato fertilization split treatments were initially estimated: Commercial control (Control), Fertilization recommended by Agrosavia (As), Monthly split fertilization recommended by Agrosavia (AsSplit), AsSplit decreasing the amount of fertilizer by 25% (AsSp25), and AsSplit decreasing the amount of fertilizer by 50% (AsSp50). AsSp50 generated the highest current and future sustainability with IS-A = 0.90, IS-45, and IS-85 = 0.88. Results suggest that integrated fertilization management practices generate a higher potato crop sustainability in the Colombian high Andean, both today and the future.spa
dc.description.productionsystemsPapaspa
dc.description.scientificnameSolanum tuberosum
dc.description.sponsorshipCorporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria - (AGROSAVIA)spa
dc.description.sponsorshipMinisterio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural - MADRspa
dc.description.sponsorshipCeiba foundationspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifierhttps://www.authorea.com/users/776949/articles/1219455-estimating-the-future-with-the-sustainability-assessment-methodology-to-soil-associated-agricultural-experimentsspa
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Corporación colombiana de investigación agropecuaria AGROSAVIA
dc.identifier.issn1085-3278
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Biblioteca Digital Agropecuaria de Colombia
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12324/41155
dc.language.isoengspa
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sons Ltdspa
dc.publisher.placeBogotá (Colombia)spa
dc.relation.citationendpage42spa
dc.relation.citationissue4spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage1spa
dc.relation.citationvolume36spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalLand Degradation and Developmentspa
dc.relation.referencesAdavi, Z., Moradi, R., Saeidnejad, A. H., Tadayon, M. R., & Mansouri, H. 2018. Assessment of potato response to climate change and adaptation strategies. Science Horticulture, 228, 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.10.017spa
dc.relation.referencesAdhikari, P., Araya, H., Aruna, G., Balamatti, A., Banerjee, S., Baskaran, P., Barah, B. C., Behera, D., Berhe, T., Boruah, P., Dhar, S., Edwards, S., Fulford, M., Gujja, B., Ibrahim, H., Kabir, H., Kassam, A., Khadka, R. B., Koma, Y.S., Natarajan, U. S., Perez, R., Sen, D., Sharif, A., Singh, G., Styger, E., Thakur, A. K., Tiwari, A., Uphoff, N., & Verma, A. 2018. System of crop intensification for more productive, resource-conserving, climate-resilient, and sustainable agriculture: experience with diverse crops in varying agroecologies. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 16, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2017.1402504spa
dc.relation.referencesAltieri, M.A. 2018. Agroecology. The science of sustainable agriculture, 2nd ed. Taylor & Francis Group, United Kingdom.spa
dc.relation.referencesAñez, B., Espinoza, W. 2006. Respuesta de la papa a la aplicación fraccionada de nitrógeno y potasio. Agricultura Andina, 11, 28–38.spa
dc.relation.referencesBarrera, L. 1998. Fertilización del cultivo de la papa en los departamentos de Cundinamarca y Boyacá. in: Guerrero, R (Ed), Fertilización de cultivos en clima frío. Monómeros Colombo Venezolanos S.A.spa
dc.relation.referencesBattilani, A., Plauborg, F. L., Hansen, S., Dolezal, F., Mazurczyk, W., & Bizik, J. 2008. Nitrogen uptake and nitrogen use efficiency of fertigated potatoes. Acta Horticulturae, 792, 61–67. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.792.4 10spa
dc.relation.referencesBaush, J.C., Bojórquez, L. T., & Eakin, H. 2014. Agro-environmental sustainability assessment using multicriteria decision analysis and system analysis. Sustainability Science, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-014-0243-yspa
dc.relation.referencesBernard, E., & Larkin, R. P., Tavantzis, S., Erich, M.S., Alyokhin, A., Sewell, G., Lannan, A., Gross, S.D. 2012. Compost, rapeseed rotation, and biocontrol agents significantly impact soil microbial communities in organic and conventional potato production systems. Applied Soil Ecology, 52, 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.10.002spa
dc.relation.referencesBurton, D. L., Zebarth, B. J., Gillam, K. M., & Macleod, J. A. 2008. Effect of split application of fertilizer nitrogen on N2O emissions from potatoes. Canadian Journal of Soil Science. 99, 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjss-2018-0150spa
dc.relation.referencesCámara de Comercio de Bogotá (CCB). Steps to create company. 2023. Available at: https://www.ccb.org.co/. Access on: June 25, 2023.spa
dc.relation.referencesCampbell, B. M., Thornton, P., Zougmoré, R., van Asten, P., & Lipper, L. 2014. Sustainable intensification: What is its role in climate smart agriculture? Current Opinion of Environmental Sustainability, 8, 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.07.002spa
dc.relation.referencesChen, Y., Camps-Arbestain, M., Shen, Q., Singh, B., & Cayuela, M. L. 2018. The long-term role of organic amendments in building soil nutrient fertility: a meta-analysis and review. Nutrient Cycle Agroecosystems, 111, 103–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-017-9903-5spa
dc.relation.referencesClarke, L., Edmonds, J., Jacoby, H., Pitcher, H., Reilly, J., & Richels, R. 2007. Scenarios of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Atmospheric Concentrations. Sub-report 2.1A of Synthesis and Assessment Product 2.1 by the U.S. Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research. Department of Energy, Office of Biological & Environmental Research, Washington, 7 DC., USA, 154 pp.spa
dc.relation.referencesDaccache, A., Keay, C., Jones, R. J. A., Waterhead, E.K., Stalhman, M. A., & Knox, J. W. 2012. Climate change and land suitability for potato production in England and Wales: impacts and adaptation. Journal of Agricultural Science, 150, 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859611000839spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Luca, A. I., Molari, G., Seddaiu, G., Toscano, A., Bombino, G., Ledda, L., Milani, M., & Vittuari, M. 2015. Multidisciplinary and Innovative Methodologies for Sustainable Management in Agricultural Systems: the Mimesmas Project. Environmental Engieneering Management Journal, 14, 1571–1581.spa
dc.relation.referencesDe Olde, E., Moller, H., Marchand, F., McDowell, R. W., MacLeod, C. J., Sautier, M., Halloy, S., Barber, A., Benge, J., Bockstaller, C., Bokkers, E. A. M., De Boer, I. J. M., Legun, K. A., Le Quellec, I., Merfield, C., Oudshoorn, F. W., Reid, J., Shader, C., Szymanski, E., Sorensen, C. A. G., Whitehead, J., & Manhire, J. 2016. When experts disagree: the need to rethink indicator selection for assessing sustainability of agriculture. Environmental Development and Sustainability, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9803-xspa
dc.relation.referencesDirección de Impuestos y Aduanas Nacionales (DIAN). Estatuto tributario. 2023. Available at: www.dian.gov.co. Access on: June 25, 2023.spa
dc.relation.referencesDzotsi, K. A., Jones, J. W., Adiku, S. G. K., Naab, J. B., Singh, U., Porter, C. H., & Gijsman, A. J. 2010. Modeling soil and plant phosphorus within DSSAT. Ecological Modelling, 221, 2839–2849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.08.023spa
dc.relation.referencesEcoinvent Centre. 2017. Ecoinvent Data V. 2.0. Version 3.4. Swiss centre for life cycle inventories. Available from: http://www.ecoinvent.org.spa
dc.relation.referencesEvans, D. L., Janes-Bassett, V., Borrelli, P., Chenu, C., Ferreira, C. S.S., Griffiths, R. I., Kalantari, Z., Keesstra, S., Lal,R., Panagos, P., Robinson, D. A., Seifollahi-Aghmiuni, S., Smith, P., Steenhuis, T. S., Thomas,A., & Visser, S. M. 2022. Sustainable futures over the next decade are rooted in soil science. European Journal of Soil Science, 73(1), e13145. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.1314516spa
dc.relation.referencesFederación colombiana de productores de papa (Fedepapa)., Ministerio de Ambiente, Vivienda y Desarrollo Territorial (Minambiente). 2004. Guía ambiental para el cultivo de la papa. Federación Colombiana de Productores de Papaspa
dc.relation.referencesFleisher, D. H., Barnaby, J., Sicher, R., Resop, J. P., Timlin, D. J., & Reddy, V. R. 2013. Effects of elevated CO2 and cyclic drought on potato under varying radiation regimes. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 171–172, 270–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.12.011spa
dc.relation.referencesFleisher, D. H., Timlin, D.J., & Reddy, V. R. 2008. Interactive effects of carbon dioxide and water stress on potato canopy growth and development. Agronomy Journal, 100, 711–719. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2007.0188spa
dc.relation.referencesFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2017. AquaCrop training handbooks. Book I. Anderstanding AquaCrop. FAO. P: 59.spa
dc.relation.referencesForero, H. D., & Garzón, M. E. 2000. Validación del modelo de simulación del crecimiento “Substor-potato V. 35” para cuatro variedades mejoradas de papa (Solanum tuberosum ssp. andígena) bajo condiciones de cultivo comercial. Tesis de pregrado. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Bogotá., Colombia. https://repository.agrosavia.co/handle/20.500.12324/16894spa
dc.relation.referencesGodwin, D. C., & Singh, U. 1998. Nitrogen balance and crop response to nitrogen in upland and lowland cropping systems, in: Tsuji, G. Y., Hoogenboom, G., Thornton, P. K (Eds), Understanding options for agricultural production. Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht, the Netherlands. p. 55–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3624-4_4spa
dc.relation.referencesGuerrero, R. 1998. Fertilización de cultivos de clima frío. Segunda edición. Monómeros Colombo-Venezolanos, Bogotá. 370 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesHeijungs R., & Guinée J. B. 2012. An overview of the life cycle assessment method – past, present, and future. In: Curran M. A (ed), Life Cycle Assessment Handbook. A Guide for Environmentally Sustainable Products. USA: Willey, pp. 15–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118528372.ch2spa
dc.relation.referencesHoogenboom, G., Porter, C. H., Boote, K. J., Shelia, V., Wilkens, P. W., Singh, U., White, J. W., Asseng, S., Lizaso, J. I., Moreno, L. P., Pavan, W., Ogoshi, R., Hunt, L. A., Tsuji, G. Y., & Jones, J. W. 2019. The DSSAT crop modeling ecosystem. In: Boote, K. J (ed), Advances in Crop Modeling for a Sustainable Agriculture. Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing, Cambridge, United Kingdom. p.173-216. http://dx.doi.org/10.19103/AS.2019.0061.10spa
dc.relation.referencesInstituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura (IICA). 2015. Modelos de simulación y herramientas de modelaje: elementos conceptuales y sistematización de herramientas para apoyar el análisis de impactos de la variabilidad y el cambio climático sobre las actividades agrícolas. IICA.spa
dc.relation.referencesJones, J. W., Hoogenboom, G., Porter, C. H., Boote, K. J., Batchelor, W. D., Hunt, L. A., Wilkens, P. W., Singh, U., Gijsman, A. J., & Ritchie, J. T. 2003. The DSSAT cropping system model. European Journal of Agronomy, 18, 235–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00107-7spa
dc.relation.referencesJones, J. W., Jianqiang, H., Boote, K. J., Wilkens, P., Porter, C. H., & Hu, Z. 2011. Estimating DSSAT cropping system cultivar-specific parameters using Bayesian techniques. In: Ahuja, L. R., Liwang, M. (Eds.), Methods of Introducing SystemModels into Agricultural Research. American Society of Agronomy, CropScience Society of America, Soil Science Society of America Madison, WI, USA.spa
dc.relation.referencesKanter, D. R., Musumba, M., Wood, S. L. R., Palm, C., Antle, J., Balvanera, P., Dale, V. H., Havlik, P., Kline, K. L., Scholes, R. J., Thornton, P., Tittonell, P., & Andelman, S. 2016. Evaluating agricultural trade-offs in the age of sustainable development. Agricultural Systems, 163, 73-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.09.010spa
dc.relation.referencesKaribskii A. V., Shishorin Y. R. & Yurchenko S. S. 2003a. Financial and economic analysis and efficiency evaluation of investment projects and programs. I. Automation and Remote Control, 64, 886–904. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024129430374spa
dc.relation.referencesKaribskii A.V., Shishorin Y. R. & Yurchenko S. S. 2003b. Financial and economic analysis and efficiency evaluation of investment projects and programs. II. Automation and Remote Control, 64, 1205–1224. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1025003529815spa
dc.relation.referencesKeating, B. A., Carberry, P. S., Hammer, G. L., Probert, M. E., Robertson, M. J., Holzworth, D., Huth, N. I., Hargreaves, J. N. G., Meinke, H., Hochman, Z., McLean, G., Verburg, K., Snow, V., Dimes, J. P., Silburn, M., Wang, E., Brown, S., Bristow, K. L., Asseng, S., Chapman, S., McCown, R. L., Freebairn, D. M., & Smith, C. J. 2003. An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation. European Journal of Agronomy, 18, 267–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00108-9spa
dc.relation.referencesKeesstra, S. D., Chenu,C., Munkholm, L. J., Cornu, S., Kuikman, P. J.,Thorsøe, M. H., Besse-Lototskaya, A., & Visser,S. M. 2024. European agricultural soil management: Towards climate-smart and sustainability, knowledge needs and research approaches. European Journal of Soil Science,75(1), e13437. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.1343724spa
dc.relation.referencesKleinwechter, U., Gastelo, M., Ritchie, J., Nelson, G., & Asseng, S. 2016. Simulating cultivar variations in potato yields for contrasting environments. Agricultural Systems, 145, 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.02.011spa
dc.relation.referencesKuisma, P. 2002. Efficiency of split nitrogen fertilization with adjusted irrigation on potato. Agricultural and food science in Finland, 11, 59–74. https://doi.org/10.23986/afsci.5713spa
dc.relation.referencesKumar, S. N., Govindakrishnan, P. M., Swarooparani, D. N., Nitin, C., Surabhi, J., & Aggarwal, P. K. 2015. Assessment of impact of climate change on potato and potential adaptation gains in the Indo-Gangetic Plains of India. International Journal of Plant Production, 9, 151–170. https://dx.doi.org/10.5958/2231-3915.2015.00011.5spa
dc.relation.referencesLizana, X. C., Avila, A., Tolaba, A., & Pablo, J. 2017. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology Field responses of potato to increased temperature during tuber bulking: Projection for climate change scenarios, at high-yield environments of Southern Chile. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 239, 192–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.03.012spa
dc.relation.referencesLöbmann, M. T., Maring, L., Prokop, G., Brils, J., Bender, J., Bispo, A., & Helming, K. 2022. Systems knowledge for sustainable soil and land management. Science of The Total Environment, 822, 153389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153389spa
dc.relation.referencesLutz, A. F., ter Maat, H. W., Biemans, H., Shrestha, A. B., Wester, P., & Immerzeel, W. W. 2016. Selecting representative climate models for climate change impact studies: an advanced envelope-based selection approach. International Journal of Climatology, 36, 3988–4005. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4608spa
dc.relation.referencesMonsalve, C. O. I., Castillo-Romero, O. G., Bojacá, A. C. R., & Henao, T. M. C. 2023 Sustainability assessment methodology oriented to soil-associated agricultural experiments. Experimental Agriculture, 59, e18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479723000145spa
dc.relation.referencesMonsalve, C. O. I., Espitia, E. M., & Bolaños-Benavides, M. M. 2020a. Split fertilization as a strategy reducing the amount of fertilizer applied to potato crops in Colombia. Case of study. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Hortícolas, 14(2), 240-248. https://doi.org/10.17584/rcch.2020v14i2.10523spa
dc.relation.referencesMonsalve, C. O.I., Gutiérrez- Díaz, J.S., Bojacá-Aldana, C. R., Henao-Toro, M. C., & Espitia-Malagón, E. M. 2021. Soil Quality Indicators with Potential Use at Plot or Experimental Unit Scale. Eurasian Soil Science, 54 (Suppl 1), S62–S75. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229321140027spa
dc.relation.referencesMonsalve, C. O. I. & Henao, T. M. C. 2022. Selection of the minimum indicator set for agricultural sustainability assessments at the plot scale. Agronomía Colombiana, 40(1), 98-108. https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v40n1.98797spa
dc.relation.referencesMonsalve, C. O. I., Luque, S. N. Y., & Henao, T. M.C. 2020b. Approach to an indicator to estimate the magnitude of physical effort in crop labors. Acta Agronómica, 69(4), 247-255. https://doi.org/10.15446/acag.v69n4.86501spa
dc.relation.referencesNing, L., Xu, X., Qiu, S., Lei, Q., Zhang, Y., Luo, J., Ding, W., Zhao, S., He, P., Zhou, W. 2023. Balancing potato yield, soil nutrient supply, and nitrous oxide emissions: An analysis of nitrogen application trade-offs. Science of The Total Environment, 899, 165628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165628spa
dc.relation.referencesOrdoñez, D. N., & Bolivar, G. A. 2014. Levantamiento agrológico del Centro Agropecuario (CAM), 1st ed. Instituto Geográfico Agustin Codazzi (IGAC), Bogotá, Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesParton, W., Schimel, D., Ojima, D., & Cole, C. 1994. A general model for soil organic matter dynamics: sensitivity to litter chemistry, texture and management. Pages 147-167 in R.B. Bryant and R.W. Arnold, editors. Quantitative modeling of soil forming processes. SSSA Spec. Publ. 39.spa
dc.relation.referencesPérez, L.C., Rodríguez, L. E., & Gómez, M. I. 2008. Efecto del fraccionamiento de la fertilización con N, P, K y Mg y la aplicación de los micronutrientes B, Mn y Zn en el rendimiento y calidad de papa criolla (Solanum phureja) variedad Criolla Colombia. Agronomia Colombiana, 26, 477–486.spa
dc.relation.referencesPorras, R. P. D., & Herrera, H. C. A. 2015. Modelo productivo de la papa variedad Diacol Capiro para el departamento de Antioquia, 1st ed. Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria (Corpoica), Mosquera, Colombia.spa
dc.relation.referencesRaymundo, R., Asseng, S., Cammarano, D., & Quiroz, R. 2014. Field Crops Research Potato, sweet potato and yam models for climate change: A review. Field Crops Research, 166, 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.06.017spa
dc.relation.referencesRaymundo, R., Asseng, S., Prassad, R., Kleinwechter, U., Concha, J., Condori, B., Bowen, W., Wolf, J., Olesen, J.E., Dong, Q., Zotarelli, L., Gastelo, M., Alva, A., Travasso, M., Quiroz, R., Arora, V., Graham, W., & Porter, C. 2017. Field Crops Research Performance of the SUBSTOR-potato model across contrasting growing conditions. Field Crops Research, 202, 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2016.04.012spa
dc.relation.referencesRaymundo, R., Asseng, S., Robertson, R., Petsakos, A., Hoogenboom, G., Quiroz, R., Hareau, G., & Wolf, J. 2018. Climate change impact on global potato production. European Journal of Agronomy, 100, 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2017.11.008spa
dc.relation.referencesRiahi, K., Gruebler, A., & Nakicenovic, N. 2007. Scenarios of long-term socio-economic and environmental development under climate stabilization. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74, 7, 887-935.spa
dc.relation.referencesRojas, B.E.O. 2011. Evaluación del desarrollo del cultivo de papa bajo escenarios de variabilidad climática interanual y cambio climático, en el sur oeste de la Sabana de Bogotá. Tesis de maestría. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Facultad de Ciencias. Departamento de Geociencias. http://www.bdigital.unal.edu.co/5242/spa
dc.relation.referencesRuser, R., Flessa, H., Schilling, R., Steindl, H., & Beese, F. 1998. Soil compaction and fertilization effects on nitrous oxide and methane fluxes in potato fields. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 62, 1587–1595. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1998.03615995006200060016xspa
dc.relation.referencesSharpley, A. N., & Williams, J. R. 1990. EPIC — erosion/productivity impact calculator: 1. Model documentation. U. S. Dep. Agric. Tech. Bull. 1768, 235. https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/19911950112spa
dc.relation.referencesSmith, P., Smith, J.U., Powlson, D. S., Mcgill, W. B., Arah, J. R. M., Chertov, O. G., Coleman, K., Franko, U., Frolking, S., Jenkinson, D.S., Jensen, L. S., Kelly, R. H., Klein-gunnewiek, H., Komarov, A. S., Li, C., Molina, J. A. E. J., Mueller, T., Parton, W. J., Thornley, J. H. M., & Whitmore, A. P. 1997. A comparison of the performance of nine soil organic matter models using datasets from seven long-term experiments. Geoderma 81, 153–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(97)00087-6spa
dc.relation.referencesSparks, A. H., Forbes, G. A., Hijmans, R. J., & Garrett, K. A. 2014. Climate change may have limited effect on global risk of potato late blight. Global Change Biology, 20, 3621–3631. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12587spa
dc.relation.referencesStackhouse, P. W., & Kusterer, J. M. 2019. NASA -POWER Data Access Viewer. NASA Langley ASDC User Serv. 1. https://power.larc.nasa.gov/spa
dc.relation.referencesSwart, R. J., Raskin, P., & Robinson, J. 2004. The problem of the future: Sustainability science and scenario analysis. Global Environmental Change, 14, 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.002spa
dc.relation.referencesTadesse, K. A., Lu, Z., Shen, Z., Daba, N. A., Li, J., Alam, M. A., Lisheng, L., Gilbert, N., Legesse, T. G., Huimin, Z. 2024. Impacts of long-term chemical nitrogen fertilization on soil quality, crop yield, and greenhouse gas emissions: With insights into post-lime application responses. Science of The Total Environment, 944, 173827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173827spa
dc.relation.referencesWCED (World Comission on Environment and Develpment). 1987. Our common future. Oxford University Pressspa
dc.relation.referencesWise, M. A., Calvin, K. V., Thomson, A. M., Clarke, L. E., Bond-Lamberty, B., Sands, R. D., Smith, S. J., Janetos, A. C., & Edmonds, J. A. 2009. Implications of Limiting CO2 Concentrations for Land Use and Energy. Science, 324, 1183-1186spa
dc.relation.referencesYang, J. M., Yang, J. Y., Dou, S., Yang, X. M., & Hoogenboom, G. 2013. Simulating the effect of long-term fertilization on maize yield and soil C/N dynamics in northeastern China using DSSAT and CENTURY-based soil model. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 95, 287–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-013-9563-zspa
dc.relation.referencesZhang, X., Xu, M., Sun, N., Xiong, W., Huang, S., & Wu, L. 2016. Modelling and predicting crop yield, soil carbon and nitrogen stocks under climate change scenarios with fertiliser management in the North China Plain. Geoderma, 265, 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.11.027spa
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/spa
dc.sourceLand Degradation and Development; Vol. 36, (2025): Land Degradation and Development ;p. 1 - 42.spa
dc.subject.agrovocSolanum tuberosumspa
dc.subject.agrovocCultivospa
dc.subject.agrovocSostenibilidadspa
dc.subject.agrovocurihttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_7221spa
dc.subject.agrovocurihttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_1972spa
dc.subject.agrovocurihttp://aims.fao.org/aos/agrovoc/c_33560spa
dc.subject.faoCultivo - F01spa
dc.subject.redRaíces y tubérculosspa
dc.titleEstimating the future with the Sustainability assessment methodology to soil-associated agricultural experimentsspa
dc.title.translatedEstimating the future with the Sustainability assessment methodology to soil-associated agricultural experimentsspa
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1spa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.localArtículo científicospa
dc.type.localengarticleeng
dc.type.redcolhttps://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTspa
dc.type.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Ver_Documento_41155.pdf
Tamaño:
869.2 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.71 KB
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: